Get Used to Gas Price Run-Ups
In addition to flowers and picnics, big hikes at the gas pump will be an annual spring tradition. Refiners won't catch up with booming demand for years.
By Jim Ostroff, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter
June 8, 2007
Advertisement
The good news: Gasoline's steep price rise is finally coming to an end.
The bad news: Sharp jumps at the pump will be annual spring events for a number of years. The traditional pattern for motor fuels, in which spring brought fairly gradual price advances ahead of the peak summer driving season, is fast becoming a pleasant memory in relative terms.
Oil's not the culprit. Blame a lack of oil refining capacity. In theory, refiners should be expanding briskly in response to explosive growth in demand for gasoline and fat profit margins. Refiners are currently clearing a whopping $30 on every barrel of oil they buy and turn into gasoline.
Refiners are expanding, but at a fairly modest pace, not fast enough to keep up with the global surge in the number of drivers as car markets in China, India, eastern Europe and other emerging economic regions take off. The U.S. thus faces much stiffer competition for imported gasoline, which now accounts for about 10% of domestic supplies.
What's holding refiners back? For one thing, they're wary of overinvesting, given the volatile nature of the energy markets. Refiners have seen margins suddenly shrink in reaction to oil price spikes or unexpected dips in gasoline use. That creates a general fear of commitment when it comes to building large, capital-intensive refineries. The proliferation of environmental regulations around the country, requiring different fuel mixes in different regions, also has made refinery building more complicated.
Coaxing by Congress to boost refinery construction won't do much good, at least in the short term. Lawmakers have eased some restrictions, reducing the federal paperwork required to obtain permits to build and operate new refineries. But refiners still have to slog through the state and local permitting process and deal with possible legal challenges by local governments and citizens. Refiners also are bracing for a host of new regulations aimed at cutting emissions of greenhouse gases, and operators don't want to commit funds before they know what to expect.
Jason Schenker, an economist with Wachovia Bank who follows the energy sector, notes that refiners generally are limiting themselves to small add-on projects at existing facilities that have already gone through the permitting process. Refinery operators also are seeking expansion through acquisitions, but this doesn't boost overall gasoline supply.
One much-touted government initiative has been to allow refineries to be built on properties formerly occupied by military bases. The Army is closing dozens of bases as part of a broad reorganization of military resources. But these properties are simply going to be turned over to local communities, whose residents will surely raise plenty of "not in my backyard" concerns when refinery projects are proposed.
Refineries are also prone to more-frequent outages as they age. The average U.S. refinery was built 30 years ago and, even with careful maintenance, is vulnerable to outages. Indeed, refinery accidents have been epidemic in the U.S. and Europe this year, adding to tightness in the gasoline and diesel markets.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


Reader Comments (8)
Posted by: George Williams at 06/08/2007 06:47:06 PM
It is true that refinery capacity has greatly lagged the growth in the number of vehicles over the past 2-3 decades in the US, but the real root-cause of lack of refinery capacity growth is the following: a) excessive law suits by environmental organizations to stop construction of any new refinery. No one even with today's returns would risk it within the US. b) Politicized anti-pollution laws have grandfathered energy wasting and high emmission equipment in old refineries. Many refiners have no incentivve to upgrade to new technology and higher efficiency equipment that forces compliance with more stringent regulations.
Posted by: Bill at 06/08/2007 06:52:53 PM
Ban the futures trading and speculation by the thieving and parasitic hedgers and energy products will return to prices set by the CONSUMER, the true market for the products.
Posted by: TIM at 06/08/2007 07:43:06 PM
Carefully crafted not to mention a single word about environmentalist lobbies blocking new refineries.
Posted by: Larry Miller at 06/08/2007 09:34:53 PM
Why not have Mexico build refineries near the US border? One could be built in very short order and the people of Mexico employ more people. Helping both countries and solving problems on both sides.
Posted by: J Baustian at 06/09/2007 01:10:03 AM
I learned absolutely nothing new in this article. Are you sure it wasn't recycled from last year or the year before?
Posted by: STEVE at 06/09/2007 04:51:17 PM
WHEN BUSH SAYS "WE WILL CREATE LARGE SCALE RENEWABLE FUELS," HE DESTROYS THE PERCEPTION OF FUTURE DEMAND FOR DISTILLATES. WOULD YOU INVEST IN OLD STYLE TELEVISIONS KNOWING THEY WILL BE ILLEGAL IN JUST A FEW MONTHS? NO ONE WILL INVEST IN SOON TO BE OUTLAWED (BY CARBON CAPS) PETROLEUM DISTILATE PLANTS, EITHER.
Posted by: Jim Ostroff at 06/11/2007 06:00:18 PM
Hi, This is Jim Ostroff. Several good points were raised that warrant further comment. The events and situations that prompted the Spring run-up in gas pump prices were unique. We explained these and forecast what motorists can expect in future years. Nothing was "recycled," since we had not written about this previously. Meanwhile, Mexico is focusing on increasing its own fuels refining capacity and isn't about to share any of it with foreign consumers. The issue of U.S. refinery capacity expansion is a complex one. Lawsuits by environmental groups have not been the main impediment to building new refineries. Rather, it has been federal and state permitting processes, and actions by local consumers, that has put the kibosh on new refineries. Refining companies haven't beaten down doors either to expand, observing it is more profitable to make incremental capacity additions. As for banning energy market trading: Be careful what you wish for. In the early part of the 20th Century there essentially was no hedging and no energy market trading. Consumers never paid more for gasoline--the equivalent of $8-a-gallon-plus, adjusted for inflation.
Posted by: Bill at 06/16/2007 03:56:13 PM
Well Jim, It seems to me the gasoline and fuels business did just fine before the parasites got involved in the late 70's. I believe I purchased gasoline for considerably less than a dollar per gallon previous to that time. With the tens of thousands of people involved in the futures scam and many news stories discussing the multi million dollar salaries, it would seem that someone is paying for it. would you deny that that someone is the consumer?