Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > World Trade, Economic Outlook
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?

Too heavy. There’s no point having him die in jail.
About right.
Not nearly heavy enough.
Not sure
 
   view results
Compare Price Quotes 100+ Services
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 2, 2009
 

Overhauling
Financial Regs

By year-end or so, Congress will give the nod to a major rewriting of the nation's financial regulatory system. This week’s Kiplinger Letter explores whether the package will do more harm than good and what lawmakers are likely to include.
 
CORRECTIONS

TRY THE LETTER:

Subscribe
| See Sample
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I just attended a franchise seminar. The speaker represents a few hundred franchises that (he says) are hand picked. He has the prospect (aka victim?) answer some questions about themselves then he makes recomendations - based on your personality, capital situation, etc.. If you pick a franchise, then he does some due dilligence for you. If you both decide it's a good idea, he helps you get started. He says he offers this service free of charge, which means he gets a commission if he's able to sell you a franchise. Has anyone done this? Successfully? Unsuccessfully?
-- fender
 

Coming to America

Foreign companies continue to pour money into the U.S. -- a destination they still view as a lucrative long-term play.
 
 

Looking for a vote of confidence in the U.S. economy? Look abroad. Overseas companies display little doubt about the ability of capital invested here to reap handsome rewards, despite the U.S. economy's current sluggishness. Inward foreign direct investment -- that is, the tally of foreign firms' purchases of U.S. business assets and their investments in greenfield projects here -- is on track to reach $238 billion this year, based on joint projections from the Columbia Program on International Investment (CPII) and the Economist Intelligence Unit. Inward FDI will hold at about that level in 2008, up sharply from last year's $175.4 billion. Annual FDI inflows are at their highest since hitting a record $314 billion in 2000 at the peak of the dot-com boom.

The U.S. remains the top destination for cross-border business investment, even though China has taken the lead in greenfield projects. Foreign companies will continue to sink money into the U.S. because it pays off. "Keep in mind, the key determinants for attracting FDI are the size of a market, economic growth, sophistication of consumers and demand," says Karl P. Sauvant, executive director of the CPII. All those are factors that make the U.S. particularly alluring over the long term. Foreign companies also crave access to cutting-edge technologies that American firms still excel in producing. What's more, the weak dollar is allowing firms from abroad to swoop in and buy or build properties here at bargain prices.

A growing share of FDI will come from the developing world. Though multinational corporations in Europe, Japan and other developed countries remain by far the largest source of FDI into the U.S., businesses in developing countries are also making their mark. For example, Taiwanese computer manufacturer Acer made a deal this year to buy Irvine, Calif.-based rival Gateway for $700 million. And Indian information technology services company Wipro Technologies is purchasing U.S. IT infrastructure management firm Infocrossing Inc. -- raising the prospect that, in a reversal of traditional U.S. offshoring fears, Bangalore may wind up farming out jobs to Leonia, N.J.

Developing-world money will also come via sovereign investment funds. These government-run entities have been set up to make better use of their countries' massive foreign exchange holdings -- mainly dollars, which typically have been invested in low-yielding but relatively safe U.S. Treasuries. Three of the richest funds are in Middle Eastern hands -- specifically, Abu Dhabi of the United Arab Emirates ($875 billion), Saudi Arabia ($300 billion) and Kuwait ($167 billion) -- thanks to the large surpluses generated by oil exports. Outside the Mideast, the funds of Singapore and China have $430 billion and $300 billion, respectively, to play with.

Deals involving state-owned foreign firms are also less likely to trigger political tensions in Washington than they were a couple of years ago. Recall the uproars over the abortive bid by Chinese oil company CNOOC to acquire Unocal and Dubai Ports World's purchase of a British company that managed facilities at various U.S. ports. Recent reforms to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), an interagency government body that vets FDI transactions such as these, will make the review process much more transparent for both Congress and investors. That will add to the length of time required for a foreign firm to complete a U.S. acquisition, but it will also reduce the risk of such a deal turning into a political football.

That said, the CFIUS reforms haven't prevented foreign countries from taking revenge on the U.S. for the FDI flaps that occurred before the reforms took effect. For example, China recently adopted new rules that will make it tougher for foreign firms to acquire companies in politically sensitive sectors of the economy. Russia, India and Germany are all considering FDI restrictions of their own.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (0)


SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   
ADD HEADLINES: