Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > Business Costs, World Trade
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?

Too heavy. There’s no point having him die in jail.
About right.
Not nearly heavy enough.
Not sure
 
   view results
Compare Price Quotes 100+ Services
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 2, 2009
 

Overhauling
Financial Regs

By year-end or so, Congress will give the nod to a major rewriting of the nation's financial regulatory system. This week’s Kiplinger Letter explores whether the package will do more harm than good and what lawmakers are likely to include.
 
CORRECTIONS

TRY THE LETTER:

Subscribe
| See Sample
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I just attended a franchise seminar. The speaker represents a few hundred franchises that (he says) are hand picked. He has the prospect (aka victim?) answer some questions about themselves then he makes recomendations - based on your personality, capital situation, etc.. If you pick a franchise, then he does some due dilligence for you. If you both decide it's a good idea, he helps you get started. He says he offers this service free of charge, which means he gets a commission if he's able to sell you a franchise. Has anyone done this? Successfully? Unsuccessfully?
-- fender
 

Doing Business in China Will Cost More

Foreign companies operating in China are being forced to deal with the state-run labor union -- and that will hurt the bottom line.
 
 

Foreign firms operating facilities in China will see labor costs zoom, thanks to pressure from the state-run union. With the government's backing, the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) is aggressively inserting itself into labor-management disputes. The Chinese government is facing mounting worker discontent, with causes ranging from inflation to unpaid overtime to brutal working conditions. Beijing is determined to head off such problems before they morph into political dissent. To that end, the ACFTU is on a membership drive, forcing large numbers of firms to let the union organize their Chinese operations or face government penalties.

"The current campaign is based on size and name," says Andreas Lauffs, an expert on Chinese labor law at the Hong Kong office of law firm Baker & McKenzie. He said that means going after Fortune Global 500 companies, even if their China operations are small.

The most direct cost to firms will be a requirement that the employer pay a fee equivalent to 2% of its total payroll into a fund that supports the union. But there will be indirect costs as well. The ACFTU is taking an active role in collective bargaining with foreign businesses, something it has traditionally avoided in dealing with state-owned or politically connected Chinese companies. And requirements that employers consult the union before engaging in any restructuring will cause delays.

Manufacturers are prime targets for the organizing campaign. Taiwan's Foxconn, for example, has been singled out as a manufacturer with a record of poor labor practices. An Apple vendor, Foxconn does most of its manufacturing in mainland China, with its largest factory in the city of Shenzhen.

But retailers and service and logistics companies are also getting tagged. Wal-Mart, McDonald's and Yum! Brands (parent of Pizza Hut and KFC) have already agreed under pressure to unionize their Chinese operations. And now the ACFTU is putting the screws to Microsoft and PricewaterhouseCoopers as well.

Erin Ennis, vice president of the U.S.-China Business Council, says that the union moves should not be blown out of proportion. The ACFTU is still affiliated with the Chinese government and the ruling Communist Party. Both still have an interest in keeping businesses happy and investment flowing, in order to create jobs. "It is not like the AFL-CIO, where, when they come in, they're automatically antagonistic."

The unionization drive is just the latest factor making China a more expensive place to operate. An employment law that went into effect Jan. 1 is already making it harder to dismiss employees. Labor shortages are driving up wages, even without union help. Tax breaks that once favored foreign investors over domestic firms have been eliminated. And the appreciation of the yuan and high fuel costs for shipping are hurting exports.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (1)


POSTED BY: Joe Honick (October 01, 2008 03:42 PM)
My, my, Andrew, sounds terribly American does it not, at least in the primitive organizing days? It is also no surprise. I have been working in and out of China and Japan for some time and produced and chaired the historic World Focus on China Housing just weeks after 9/11. It is at once and entrepreneurial and controled society, with the former just as powerful as the latter reality. They love the business of business, copy us even as we are becoming less relevant on the international scene. Much more to all that.

SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   
ADD HEADLINES: