Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > Sector Outlooks, Human Resources
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Should Congress lift the ban on drilling offshore and in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge?

Yes. America needs America's oil.
No. Oil companies have enough land to drill.
Not sure.
 
   view results
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 3, 2008
 

Big-Bank Woes
Begin to Spread

The largest U.S. banks are hurting badly, and the pain is starting to spread. Most small and midsize banks are still ready to lend to businesses, but they're getting nervous. This week's Kiplinger Letter examines the outlook.
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I am a strong believer border security, keeping track of work and student visas, etc but do you think that deportation of illegal immigrants is a waste of money?
-- Dingobiscuit
 

Can the UAW Save Detroit?

A new contract agreement to be inked in September will give the Big Three a big break.
 
 

The United Auto Workers (UAW) union will do a big favor for the Big Three automakers: It will agree to a landmark labor contract this fall, assuming a large chunk of the health care costs that make it difficult for General Motors (GM), Ford and DaimlerChrysler to compete with Toyota, Honda, Nissan and other automakers.

These lofty health expenses account for about $1500 of the average $3500-per-car cost disadvantage that Big Three plants suffer versus foreign manufacturers' U.S. plants. The UAW deal will narrow that margin by roughly $1000.

But U.S. automakers will still be in precarious shape. The UAW probably won't bite on a number of other cost-slashing proposals, including big pay cuts for new hires and converting some pensions to 401(k) plans. The union frets that such concessions will leave workers with no negotiating leverage with automakers when the contract comes up for renewal again in 2011.

Still, when the smoke clears from the contentious contract negotiations over health care concessions -- which could feature short wildcat strikes -- it will become plain that the accord will be unlike any other the UAW has signed with the Big Three since the union won bargaining rights more than 70 years ago.

The UAW will assume responsibility for health care benefits for more than 1 million active and retired autoworkers, relieving Detroit of more than $100 billion in obligations. In exchange, GM, Ford and DaimlerChrysler will agree to provide as much as $70 billion, collectively, to fund a UAW-run Voluntary Employees' Benefits Association that will pay its members' health care costs.

That won't be cheap, but the carmakers will take the deal because they'll effectively be able to meet their health care obligations at a discount. By reducing their liability, the automakers will help improve their credit ratings, lowering future borrowing costs. The UAW will bet that increased health care premiums for autoworkers, the compounding of interest on money the union receives from the automakers and expected health care benefit cost reductions as retirees die will keep the fund solvent well into the 2020s.

The union has little choice but to take its chances. "Making incremental, tiny concessions is likely to result in one or even all three of the automakers going down, having to file for bankruptcy, and if that happens, [the UAW] knows there will be no health care benefits and no assurance of jobs," says David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, an auto industry consulting firm. Health care costs add about $30 to the hourly pay for GM, Ford and DaimlerChrysler production workers, boosting it to $70 to $75 an hour. The compensation for nonunion workers at Toyota, Honda, Nissan and other transplant automakers' U.S. plants, including health care, runs $40 to $45 an hour.

Contract talks are sure to go down to the wire. Odds are 50-50 that the UAW will accept the Big Three companies' stock as partial payment of the health care program buyout. The union always has opposed taking such a stake for fear of being seen as cozy with Motor City business, but is likely to do it this time around to keep the deal from collapsing.

Look for Detroit's automakers to be on slightly firmer ground by 2010 or so, but not out of the woods by a long shot. To regain their financial health, they'll have to reduce operating costs in areas outside of health care -- such as by cutting white-collar staffs and parts-sourcing costs, and increasing automation -- to whittle down the production cost gap with foreign brand rivals. That's a must-do, since their share of the U.S. market for new vehicles likely will drop from about 53% today to 48% by 2010. The Big Three must also start producing more types of vehicles that Americans want to buy.

Ford remains in the most precarious financial position. It lost nearly $13 billion last year, and the company's most optimistic scenario doesn't foresee it turning any profit until 2009. The automaker could face real trouble by next year, despite the UAW's health care concessions and Ford's own belt-tightening.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (6)


SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |    
ADD HEADLINES: