Big Changes Coming to the Workplace
Actions at both the legislative and regulatory levels will boost labor protections.
By Martha Lynn Craver, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter
October 13, 2009
Advertisement
The Obama administration is cranking out a slew of regulations affecting businesses. Political appointees are in control at most Cabinet departments and regulatory agencies, and they’re having an influence. Congress is also getting into the act, albeit more slowly. Most of the changes will boost labor protections against workplace hazards, discrimination, unfair pay policies and in other personnel disputes. For employers, it means more costs and red tape as they’re forced to show they’re in compliance.
“It’s hard to believe that a widget maker will have any time to make widgets in this hyper-enforcement environment,” says Rae T. Vann, general counsel at the Equal Employment Advisory Council, an employer group.
Among the changes that may affect your company:
Safety checks. Much tougher enforcement from OSHA, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration, is in the works -- also rules on exposure from combustible dust to diacetyl. The agency will launch a big new push on ergonomics, perhaps making another run at producing a specific rule on repetitive motion injuries. But legislation to give OSHA beefed-up powers, including increasing fines for violations and providing wider protection to whistle-blowers, will take longer and won’t pass anytime soon.
Wages. Expect quicker and more thorough follow-up of worker complaints. The Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division is putting 250 more investigators on the job to probe pay disputes and try to resolve problems. Plus there’ll be more enforcement of rules against unfair practices.
Discrimination. A broader definition of disability will expand protection under the ADA, Americans with Disabilities Act, to more individuals. Business groups are up in arms about the proposed rule by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, claiming that the agency exceeded authority by including in the proposed rule a list of impairments that will consistently meet the definition of disability. If the rule stands, it will bog down the system as employers have to defend themselves against many more charges of discrimination.
Another EEOC rule would impose restrictions on health risk assessments (HRAs), a key component of employers’ wellness programs. The rule implements a 2008 law banning the use of genetic info in decisions on employment. Its broad definition of “genetic information” includes family medical history, and employers may not provide any rewards or penalties tied to an HRA that asks for family medical history.
Union Rights. A pro-labor stance by the National Labor Relations Board is certain as soon as Congress confirms President Obama’s appointees, giving Democrats a majority. Look for reversals of key decisions made by Bush appointees on the use of e-mail by workers for union organizing and representation of nonunion workers at disciplinary meetings. The new board also is likely to narrow the definition of a supervisor, which will make more workers eligible to join a union.
Congress will OK several pro-labor bills next year over the objections of business groups. Legislation to overturn a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on age discrimination is likely. The bill would overturn a recent Court ruling that held a worker must prove that age discrimination was the determining factor in job loss, not just one of several.
Employer groups are not opposing a bill to ban employer discrimination based on sexual orientation, and it is a good bet for passage. The legislation probably will not cover transgender individuals and won’t apply to small business with fewer than 15 workers, the military or religious organizations.
Not likely to clear Congress are two big labor priorities: A requirement that all employers offer paid sick leave, which many small firms say they can’t afford. And no card check rule -- at least not in the form that unions would like it to take.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


Reader Comments (5)
Posted by: \ at 10/13/2009 03:40:00 PM
No surprise there. He's trying everything else to kill business and the economy so as to make more and more people dependent on government so why not load down the golden goose of our economy, the small businesses.
Posted by: CM Wolfe, Montana at 10/13/2009 10:24:24 PM
How dare the government let workplace safety, fair pay practices and such "hyperenforcement" policies interfere with making a profit. Don't they know discrimination benefits the shareholders?
Posted by: Steve A. at 10/14/2009 01:39:40 PM
Hey CM - If you don't like the safety or pay practices of your job quit. More often then not the rules and regs simply add cost for no real benefit. Our business has 5% of our (private) parking set aside for handicapped people. Not once in ten years has a handicapped person come to our business so the cost of that part of the parking lot was wasted. But no worries the Chinese and others will be happy to make all of the stuff we need. Don't mind that 10% unemployment as all the jobs move overseas. Profit is good - it funds R&D and new ventures and tells businesses how well they are serving the customers. (see also GM v. Toyota)
Posted by: justice at 10/14/2009 03:39:08 PM
Steve A. ... I too am a business owner and never had any legal issues as I follow by the rules and know what it is like to be discriminated against and being disabled. I treat my Employees with respect and make sure that the workplace that I provide for them is safe. Employers and or people like you want to do whatever you want to without the benefit or responsibility. With all of the tax and other benefits that we employers get to enjoy, why not provide a safe work environment as it's noted under the workers compensation act.
Posted by: Ferdinand Rajcany at 10/14/2009 06:04:22 PM
My God!! You Americans still have this UNJUST work practices THIRTY years after Australia abolished them! And you say that you are free?! What a joke! Obama is right you need this laws to motivate workers to lift their productivity. No Wander USA economy is in such a MESS! You are using ancient work practices in 21st century! Wake up USA and learn from Australia. While your country is in BIG MESS Australia is FORGING AHEAD in all fields of economy. Look our dollar, our exports, our imports etc..no country in the World can match it. Our unemployment is less than 6%. Mining is booming and needs lot of workers. Our social security is so good it is not worth for many unemployed to go to work at all. This all is due to practices which Obama wants to implement in your country. Actually he MUST go even further and regulate your companies and financial sector so they can not ruin your economy due to their bastardly greed. This mess USA and the World is in now is due to lack of regulations of these monsters which do not want to be regulated and will do everything possible to stop your economy come to 21st century. You want good and safe living, come to Australia. If you are young and skilled in any field in mining, engineering, health and IT you will be welcomed anytime. See where REAL FREEDOM is. Ps: Dont speak of ignorance, who cares about parking lots when there are much bigger problems to deal with! Wake up!!