Baseball Braces for a Less Hopeful Season

The end of spring training is usually a time of unlimited possibilities for baseball players and fans. Not this year.

By Andrew C. Schneider, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

April 3, 2009
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Major League Baseball will prove anything but recession proof this time around. With regular season play set to begin Sunday, the sport is looking ahead to a bleak 2009. Rising unemployment has consumers worried. They're gripping their wallets with white knuckles, ensuring that ticket and concession sales will fall this year. So will advertising revenue, both from stadium billboards and from TV and radio commercials. But even all that just scratches the surface of the teams' worries.

The industries that have been baseball's strongest benefactors in years past, banks and carmakers, are among the worst hit by the recession. Those that are accepting federal bailout funds -- or even facing bankruptcy, as in the cases of GM and Chrysler -- are being forced to slash anything that could be construed as unnecessary spending. That means abandoning leases on private boxes and suites, a huge source of revenue for the teams.

"Congress is putting a lot of pressure on companies not to be spending money on what it sees as luxuries," says Lisa Delpy Neirotti, an associate professor of tourism and sports management at George Washington University. Neirotti notes that companies use their suites as a marketing tool, as a way of luring or keeping customers. But it's a hard case for troubled firms to make, given recurring populist anger over executive compensation. "It's an image thing. People see it as a luxury perk and don't understand there's a business motivation behind it," Neirotti says.

The image problem is playing out on a much larger scale in New York. Citigroup had signed a $400-million deal with the Mets for naming rights to the team's new stadium. Citi Field, the replacement for now-demolished Shea Stadium, will host the Mets' first home game of the season April 13. But the troubled financial services giant is seeking an exit from its stadium marquee pact. If Citigroup manages to get out of its contract, other ballpark sponsors may follow suit.

Baseball has a buffer, thanks to the organization's long-term broadcasting contracts. That will help smaller market teams, which benefit from revenue sharing agreements with richer franchises, particularly the New York Yankees and the Los Angeles Dodgers. But the teams are also locked into multiyear contracts with players. That's no problem as long as the player continues to perform, but it becomes a liability if he's injured or if his playing erodes as he ages.

The free agent market provides a window on team owners' concerns. Back in December, the Yankees signed multiyear contracts with three free agents: Mark Teixeira, CC Sabathia and A.J. Burnett for a cumulative $423.5 million. But those signings proved the exceptions in an otherwise dreary off season.

"Something like 100 free agents were unsigned a week before spring training began. That's a record by a large margin," says Andrew Zimbalist, Robert A. Woods Professor of Economics at Smith College. "Teams are being cautious because of expectations of low revenues and owners being clobbered by [losses on] other investments."

State and municipal governments are deep in the red and can provide no assistance to franchises seeking new stadiums or to renovate their current homes.

Teams will offer discounts to keep the fans from drifting away. The San Diego Padres and concessionaire partner Delaware North are offering fans at PETCO Park a deal of five concession items for $5. A single game ticket for the mezzanine level of Cincinnati's Great American Ball Park runs for $22, but for another $8, Reds fans get all they can eat. The Baltimore Orioles are offering fans who sign up on the team's Web site a free ticket on their birthday. The Orioles are also partnering with Chick-fil-A to offer a package of tickets to 10 games for $17 to children 14 and under.

A few teams, including the 2008 World Series champion Philadelphia Phillies, are shunning such discounts, counting on large, loyal fan bases to carry them through the hard times. But most franchises will have no choice. Indeed, by midyear, lower attendance will force some teams to slash ticket prices.

For franchises already in trouble, this year or next could break them, forcing them to uproot and move to a new city in search of larger ticket sales. Teams that have only recently relocated, such as the Washington Nationals, will be given more time to get their bearings. But more storied franchises showing weak returns are at high risk. Among the most troubled teams are the Reds, the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Kansas City Royals.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (5)

Posted by: AJ at 04/03/2009 05:01:17 PM

All prices are up (tickets, food, beer, parking etc). In Boston, an outing for four is now $400 for decent tickets. I don't understand how anyone can afford that. The only prices going down are that for TVs. For the price of 2-3 visits to the ballpark, I am going to get an HD TV and watch the games from the comfort of my home. And a 12 oz beer is closer to 75c rather than $7.50 at the ballpark.

Posted by: Doug-H at 04/04/2009 12:25:01 PM

I really doubt any of those teams will be going anywhere.. They all just either got new or upgraded stadiums... The cities that just paid for them will do anything to hang on... Even the low draw Florida Marlins just got a shot in the arm when it was agreed to build a baseball stadium where the old Orange Bowl was.. I suspect a domed one too. The only older ballparks left are in Chicago and Boston and they have patched up Wrigley and Fenway as much as the can. I think the only choice teams have if the finance doesn't work is folding since there are no other places that could or would support MLB...

Posted by: Stan the Man at 04/05/2009 10:51:34 AM

I love baseball. Grew up with it, but they've completely lost my kids generation. I took my two boys to one game a few years ago and haven't been back since. I could believe how much money I had spent at the park. When I was a kids, my mom would drop us off at Wrigley with a couple of bucks and my brother and I could enjoy the day. She would pick us up after the game or we'd take the bus home... My kids never had a chance at that same experience!

Posted by: Andrew Schneider at 04/06/2009 10:56:22 AM

Andrew Schneider of Kiplinger here. Doug-H is correct about the Marlins. Not too long ago, they were looking like the best bet for a franchise to relocate. That was before Miami-Dade County and the City of Miami worked out a deal to get them a new stadium (which they needed, as the Dolphins already announced they would not allow the Marlins to keep using Dolphins Stadium after 2010). The problem is financing. The county and city governments have to come up with well over half the funding. They've budgeted for much of it to come from tourist taxes. With tourism down as a result of the recession, that revenue stream is less than certain. The problem is that none of the cities that had been hoping to snap up the Marlins are doing any better.

Posted by: SSD at 04/06/2009 03:29:41 PM

Ditto to your points AJ. While MLB is aware of the exhorbitant costs for a family to attend a mere 1 game, it's current leadership lacks the foresight to see the spiraling fall of the game and fan base in current econmoic conditions. Shame on MLB, Team Owners, Players, and especially the Media. The media and networks (i.e ESPN)thrive on reporting the sport's controversy and fuel it to obtain fan outrage, but come up very short on responsibility and integrity on this matter. Baseball in 2009 and beyond will see less and less of the family that struggles to stay alive. So long major league baseball!

Today's Video More Videos >>

Save Money in February

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement