Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > Business Costs, Energy Costs
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?

Too heavy. There’s no point having him die in jail.
About right.
Not nearly heavy enough.
Not sure
 
   view results
Compare Price Quotes 100+ Services
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 2, 2009
 

Overhauling
Financial Regs

By year-end or so, Congress will give the nod to a major rewriting of the nation's financial regulatory system. This week’s Kiplinger Letter explores whether the package will do more harm than good and what lawmakers are likely to include.
 
CORRECTIONS

TRY THE LETTER:

Subscribe
| See Sample
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I just attended a franchise seminar. The speaker represents a few hundred franchises that (he says) are hand picked. He has the prospect (aka victim?) answer some questions about themselves then he makes recomendations - based on your personality, capital situation, etc.. If you pick a franchise, then he does some due dilligence for you. If you both decide it's a good idea, he helps you get started. He says he offers this service free of charge, which means he gets a commission if he's able to sell you a franchise. Has anyone done this? Successfully? Unsuccessfully?
-- fender
 

A Win-Win Plan to Slow the Rise in Electricity Rates

Is there a way to reduce pollution, save oil and gas supplies and still cut costs to consumers and power companies? It's called "negawatts."
 
 

Businesses and homeowners will soon get help in taming their electric bills, and that could make everyone better off. A growing number of states are requiring electric utilities to slow planned growth in power use by 10% over 10 years. The rules don't tell companies how to reach that target, but one of the easiest ways is to aggressively help customers conserve power through energy audits, technical advice and even financial help in buying everything from superefficient equipment to insulated windows for factories, offices and homes. Most utilities already have similar programs in place, so beefing them up shouldn't be difficult.

Consumers will like the idea because they'll pay less. Power companies like it because they won't have to create more capacity that lies unused except during peak periods. And states like the concept because they are under the gun to meet federal clean air standards. They see the so-called negawatt programs as the easiest way to limit power plant emissions. More than half of U.S. electricity is made by burning coal, the dirtiest fuel. Around 20% is produced by natural gas, which burns much cleaner but emits carbon dioxide, which has been linked to global warming.

Texas' negawatt program—the first in the nation—was put in place in 2000. California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Vermont have also instituted programs. Illinois and New Jersey will adopt the program this year, and Florida, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island and Washington are expected to do the same in 2007. A majority of states will follow by 2010. Similar programs for natural gas consumption are likely in the next decade.

Utilities rarely resist because cutting waste is good for their bottom lines. Adding new capacity is very expensive, and generators often sit idle when demand is slack. Costs of building new power plants are passed along to business and residential customers, and many utilities that have taken flak for soaring bills attributable to higher coal and natural gas prices are eager to keep costs in check in the future. Compliance with the programs is certified by private companies such as Summit Blue Consulting and Sieben Energy Associates.

Utilities can opt out of the programs, but they have to pay fees based on assessments of how much they could have cut back on growth by improving customer energy efficiency. Utilities that take part are given flexibility in case they have difficulty meeting the reduction goals, since they can buy compliance credits issued by state regulators from other utilities that actually beat their targets. Credits can be bought and sold only within a given state, but that's likely to change within a few years as most regions set up rules that will allow credit swaps within each region.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (0)


SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   
ADD HEADLINES: