Winners in Global Warming

A host of businesses are poised to profit from the drive to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

By Jim Ostroff, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

Laura Steele, Researcher-Reporter, the Kiplinger letters

April 25, 2007
Text Size T T

Advertisement

It's clear that greening the U.S. economy will cause pain for some businesses -- especially electric utilities and automakers. These industries stand to bear the brunt of state and federal efforts to fight global warming by placing regulatory caps on the amount of greenhouse gases (GHGs) pumped into the atmosphere. Utilities and autos together produce about 55% of these gases.

Some 15 states, representing more than a third of the national economy, will have GHG emissions limits by 2012, and federal caps will probably follow that. And over the next 10 years or so, look for Congress to gradually increase the minimum average gas mileage imposed on auto manufacturers' fleets. For passenger cars, it's likely to rise to about 40 miles per gallon from the current 27.5 miles per gallon.

Like car manufacturers, utilities are going to have to invest hundreds of billions of dollars to run cleaner. For their part, power companies are likely to pass along to customers the roughly 25% increase in costs that they'll incur for providing cleaner electricity.

However, there is also plenty of gain to spread around, as companies of all stripes seek outside help and new technologies to help them clean up their act. Retail behemoth Wal-Mart, for example, is budgeting $500 million a year for emissions-cutting measures. Bank of America, Exelon Corp., Swiss Re and Toyota have all pledged to reduce their U.S. operations' contributions to global warming over the next few years.

The most obvious winners are alternative energy firms -- those involved in power generation from wind, solar, geothermal sources and biomass. Alt-power's share of the electricity market will grow from about 10% now to 25% over the next 15 years, driven largely by government mandates on the proportion of utilities' output that must come from renewable sources. This is manna for green power brokers such as Green Mountain Power and Renewable Choice Energy, and for firms that perform energy audits and install custom alt-energy systems for manufacturers and others.

See our slideshow of what firms will gain as industries, consumers go green

The race for renewable juice is also likely to benefit vendors of gas digester systems, such as Landfills+, BeUtilityFree and AgriPower. These companies' gizmos capture methane from landfills, wastewater treatment plants and other organic sources to power electric generators.

The less visible beneficiaries are the legions of suppliers to alt-power industries that will share in the spoils. In wind, there's Zoltek, which makes composite materials used in turbine blades. American Superconductor sells technology that makes wind-generated electricity compatible with the power grid. And VRB Power Systems makes wind-power electricity storage units. In solar, Amonix, Miasolé, Nanosolar, SunPower and several others are developing cheaper, more-efficient photoelectric cells that will soon be the industry standard.

Other firms will mine the coming expansion of nuclear power, which has gained considerable support because it produces no greenhouse gases. One such beneficiary is Allegheny Technologies, a maker of titanium alloys and other specialty metals used in nuclear plants. Vendors of heavy-duty pumps, such as Sulzer Pumps, also are sitting in the atomic catbird seat. USEC, a global energy company, is going to log steadily rising orders for fuel-grade uranium. BWX Technologies is one of the few firms able to do the precise machining on reactor parts. And concrete suppliers such as LaFarge are in for bonanza orders. Each nuclear reactor needs five times as much concrete as the foundation and flooring used in construction of the Sears Tower.

Then there is the army of companies that will help others improve energy efficiency. "One-third of the target greenhouse gas emissions can be eliminated with increased energy efficiency. That's the first thing that companies should consider doing," says Richard Baxter, a senior vice president with Ardour Capital Investments.

If they do so, expect Elster Electricity, Itron, Sensirion, eMeter and SmartSynch to benefit. They sell meters that track real-time fluctuations in power prices, allowing manufacturers and others to better monitor the cost of their energy use. Comverge and EnerNOC make the software and microelectronics that permit power users to adjust their demand quickly. In addition, companies will snap up cogeneration units that tap heat created by machinery and convert it into power. Leading suppliers include Cummins, DG Power Systems and Enercon.

Utilities also will turn to IBM, Invensys Controls, Areva and other IT firms to help develop a more flexible power grid. Why? Utilities need to be able to purchase renewable electricity from multiple local and often far-flung sources, as well as surplus power from businesses and homeowners with their own generating units. So-called net metering laws will actually allow a utility customers' meter to run backward when the business or home is adding power to the grid.

Cleaning up production of fossil fuel energy is another gold mine. Prospectors include Foster-Miller and NeuCo, which make systems that remove airborne pollutants from coal plant emissions. Add to the list E.ON U.S., PPL Corp. and others, which are developing next-generation "clean coal" power plants that produce little or no pollution. Further down the road, services to move carbon dioxide to underground storage -- known as carbon sequestration -- will fatten the accounts of geology surveying firms and for vendors of drilling equipment and steel pipes.

Meanwhile, automakers will seek help from many quarters to keep up with increasingly stringent fuel efficiency standards and to develop low- or no-emissions automobiles. Magna International is among the companies developing ultralight, yet sturdy, steels for auto bodies, as well as steel-aluminum and plastic composites for mechanical systems, all designed to cut vehicular weight. Carmakers will also call on firms such as Borg Warner and SKF for high-efficiency drivetrains and turbochargers plus computer-controlled steering and braking systems. Another group of companies, including ECD Ovonics, Ballard Power and Apollo Energy, is going to feature in a burgeoning market for auto fuel cells.

Nearly all companies and homeowners will be in the market for Earth-friendly building products and fixtures. Put high-efficiency compact fluorescent lightbulbs at the top of the list. An easy and inexpensive way to trim power use, one such bulb can eliminate the need to burn 110 pounds of coal for electricity over its lifetime. Makers include Osram Sylvania, Westinghouse, General Electric and MaxLite. Revised building codes will also push construction firms toward using more substitutes for lumber, glass, concrete and other materials whose manufacture emits high levels of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. Newly developed alternative materials include home insulation made from old jeans and jeans scraps as well as boards made from recycled wheat chaff that are used for doors, cabinets and floors.

State and federal governments are playing a big role in generating demand for Earth-friendly products as they strive to lower their fuel bills. Leading items on official shopping lists are special coatings and other materials for green roofs, furniture made from recyclable materials and environmentally friendly cleaning supplies.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (11)

Posted by: Nick at 04/25/2007 09:19:13 AM

I'm all for everything that they're doing to reduce gas emissions, but they're doing it for the wrong reasons. Humans aren't contributing to global warming, and anyone who thinks we do it either extremely ignorant or extremely arrogant. Instead of doing all this to stop global warming (which will never happen), how about we do it to reduce pollution? because I'm tired of seeing smog line the skylines of Salt Lake City, Los Angelos, and other major cities.

Posted by: Jack Matier at 04/25/2007 01:45:39 PM

This is a reply to posted by Nick, April 25. Global warming depends on the sun, which will eventually expand and fry our planet. The time frame for this is long, however, and gives us time to either move the planet, or escape to some new world with a younger sun. Global warming also depends on earth's orbit which is pretty stable and I don't think we know enough to threaten that wonderful stability at this time. Global warming also depends on the atmosphere, and the gases that make it up. Of these, methane, carbon dioxide and others increase the greenhouse effect. The effect of a thick atmosphere containing much carbon dioxide is clearly demonstrated by the surface temperatures on our neighboring planet Venus.That temperature is above 900degrees fahrenheit which is good for self-cleaning ovens. We are pouring CO2 into our atmosphere. Earth's orbit is stable. The sun is stable. The glaciers and sea ice are melting. So Nick, I think the facts dictate that we control and lower our enormous output of CO2, which we can do,now. The trick is to do that, and keep our great lifestyle at the same time. Vaya con diosa.

Posted by: jj at 04/25/2007 02:39:55 PM

Wake up America. If we don't switch from carbon based to nuclear based power soon, we will be in serious trouble. Wind, solar & biomass are great suggestions, but nuclear makes the most sense economically & environmentally. Ethanol is a fad.

Posted by: at 04/25/2007 02:53:17 PM

I agree with those who suggest our motivation should be to decrease pollution, which we can do; rather than stop global warming, which we can't.

Posted by: Warren at 04/25/2007 02:55:40 PM

This article mentions two companies, Enernoc and Comverge, in regards to demand response and neglects the solution that is deployed by Microsoft and their company, EnergyConnect. ECI is the national leader in demand response and worked to develop the systems for the PJM interconnection- (THE LARGEST GRID IN THE WORLD!) I am not sure how you missed them, but they deserve attention.

Posted by: km at 04/25/2007 04:46:34 PM

The world has to get past the Jane Fonda fear of nuclear power and realize that it is "the only viable alternative source" to power all the energy needs across the globe.

Posted by: Jim Ostroff at 04/25/2007 10:42:41 PM

Hi everyone. This is Jim Ostroff, who wrote the "Global Warming" article along with my colleague Laura Steele. We're both pleased that the article has spurred so much comment and debate. There is a growing body of evidence indicating that atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are rising to very high levels; that terrestial and ocean temperatures are rising pretty much in lockstep. They key point is that regardless of the pros and cons of cllimate change theories, the U.S. government, as well as many corporations, have concluded that various actions must be taken to reduce emissions of gases believed to affect climate. As you know, Kiplinger NEVER takes sides on any issue, regardless of individual editors' personal beliefs. However, we do strive hard to say what is likely to occur, or be implemented in the coming months, or years. Kiplinger would be remiss if it failed to let businesses and consumers know what is coming down the pike in order that they can prepare and act on the information. Fact is, there will be a raft of new laws and regulations that will affect how many companies operate and what they and consumers pay for energy.

Posted by: Jay at 04/26/2007 01:13:52 AM

How much closer to the Sun is Venus compared to the Earth? The average temperatures on Earth haven't risen since 1998. To think that in the last century we have been able to disrupt 4.5 billion years of climate change is ludicrous. The climate is constantly changing on our little planet here. Most likely caused by shifts in the output of heat and radiation from the Sun. Clean the environment, yes, but not because Al Gore says we will all die in 10 years, do it because it is the right thing to do.

Posted by: gg at 04/26/2007 01:47:49 AM

Are there mutual funds that invest in companies like these leading efforts for conservation?

Posted by: Avid Reader at 04/26/2007 08:59:47 AM

Jim and Laura, interesting article. There are many articles which focus on climate change alone. It was good to see it from a different angle; from potential beneficiaries of climate change. At the risk of sounding picky, the companies mentioned with metering technologies do not necessarily track pricing with the meters. Instead they track energy consumption in a more detailed way (with greater resolution and more frequently) to permit utilities to implement electrical rates based on real time electricity prices. Also, there are a number of companies providng services similar to Comverge and Enernoc. While they are very active, they also happen to have very good marketing. One of the most successful of those companies within PJM (largest power pool in the world) is a company called Enerwise which is rumored to have very recently cleared two-thirds of the demand response load in the first of a new energy supply auction "RPM". RPM allows demand response resources (or elastic loads) to be valued and utilized like large scale generation.

Posted by: M. Goodell at 04/29/2007 08:02:17 AM

If greenhouse gas emissions are to be reduced, we need to close down inefficient "central" power plants, that are only 33% efficient, and waste 67% of the primary fuel used to generate electricity. Instead of generating "brown power" at central power plants, that can be hundreds of miles from where the energy is needed, we need to begin installing "Trigeneration" power/energy systems where the power and energy is needed. Trigeneration is a technology that converts 90% of the fuel into 3 energies - "cooling, heating and power" Trigeneration power plants will significantly reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions. And, trigeneration power plants will pay for themselves in as little as 1-3 years (depending on local electric rates) through the energy savings provided by trigeneration. Finally, when trigeneration power plants are fueled by renewable fuels such as Biomethane or B100 Biodiesel, instead of natural gas, the power and energy generated is 100% carbon neutral.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Turning Allowances Into Savings

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement