PRINT
EMAIL
COMMENT
BUZZ UP
DIGGEXECUTIVE POLL
Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?
OUR PREMIUM CONTENT
The Kiplinger Agriculture Letter
The Kiplinger California Letter
Kiplinger's Biofuels Market Alert
Kiplinger's Retirement Report
SUBSCRIBER HELP
CURRENT LETTER
Overhauling
Financial Regs
PREVIOUS ISSUES
A wave of foreclosures will crest next year, forcing the new Congress to take up bankruptcy reform in 2009. At issue is a provision that prohibits judges from ordering banks to renegotiate mortgage terms with homeowners when they file for protection from creditors under bankruptcy or reorganization law.
Consumer and banking lobby groups battled over modifying this bankruptcy law for years. Even amid the latest crisis on Wall Street when banks are more vulnerable than at any time in recent memory, efforts failed to include a provision in the financial market rescue plan that would have required banks to write down mortgage terms under certain conditions.
"[Legislators] clearly decided this is not a priority," at this time, says Ruth Susswein, deputy director of national priority at Consumer Action. "But we will continue to push for it, because it is the only plan that actually doesn't cost the taxpayers anything." Banking lobbyists argue that consumers end up paying higher interest rates that banks charge to offset the cost of writing down bad loans.
But the current housing market crisis is pushing Congress toward giving some additional options to up to 400,000 homeowners at risk of foreclosure. As of Oct. 1, homeowners struggling to make payments who meet certain criteria set out by the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) can ask their bank to write down the value of their mortgage to at least 90% of the home's market value and lower the interest rates on the mortgage. In exchange, the bank will get FHA backing, guaranteeing payment from the government if the homeowner defaults.
But consumer groups say the measure won't stem a coming flood of foreclosures. Bankruptcies will continue rising, and an increasing number of people will lose their homes to banks. In the first half of 2008, banks foreclosed on 1.2 million homes, and this is expected to rise even higher than the 2007 figure of 1.5 million homes as more and more homeowners lose jobs and become saddled with bills they can't pay.
"Soon we will discover that the bailout will do nothing to stop foreclosures," says Henry Summer, president of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys. "Changing bankruptcy law is the only way to do that."
Congress might even take up the 2005 bankruptcy law and tackle consumer complaints that the process is on average 50% more expensive than it used to be. Reform advocates argue that the law creates unnecessary paperwork and forces people about to file for bankruptcy into pointless credit counseling sessions that often do little more than postpone the inevitable. "Certainly there are a lot of parts of that law that are not doing good for anyone," says Summer. "It was supposed to ferret out abuses, but it hasn't."
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
POSTED BY: Todd (October 16, 2008 12:03 PM)
Capitalism waived its right to complain about government modification of loans (via bankruptcy judges), when it called upon government dollars to rescue a financial mess of its own making. Make up your mind, either Capitalism uses market factors to control itself and stays away from taxpayer money or else it avails itself of taxpayer money and waives its right to claim "ideological purity." We don't have Capitalism, we have unchecked Greed. For my money (and it is my money too), Americans and American lives trump hypocritical ideology and runaway greed every time.
POSTED BY: perplexed (October 16, 2008 05:11 PM)
Thought that I heard on C-Span (10-16-08) that current bankruptcy law allows
those in foreclosure to seek court-ordered modification of their mortgage
to reflect current market value of home.
POSTED BY: Kevin Valenta (October 18, 2008 11:42 PM)
that bankruptcy courts may currently not modify mortgage loans is an CRITICAL omission in basic a system of checks and balances - lenders and investors have far too little to risk with their current immunity from the same type of bankruptcy court loan modifications other types of consumer loans are subject to - had this provision of bankruptcy law already been revised it seems likely that a large percentage of the bad loans would simply not have been made - as a mitigation measure to the current morass it would be very effective in helping to stem the increasing wave of forclosures which is pre-requisit to improvement in the housing market
E-Mail Article
Print Article
Reprint Article
