A Slew of Tax Easings Is on the Way

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act has breaks for individuals and business alike.

By Joan Pryde, Senior Tax Editor, the Kiplinger letters

Peter Blank, Editor, The Kiplinger Tax Letter

February 18, 2009
Text Size T T

Advertisement

For taxpayers, it's Christmas in February: a stimulus package with more than $300 billion in tax breaks designed to get both individuals and businesses to open their wallets and lift the economy out of its slump. Most of the cuts disappear after a year or two and almost none of them are available to filers in the highest income brackets.

Still, the new law has plenty to offer taxpayers this year.

  • A payroll tax credit for wage earners and the self-employed for 2009 and 2010 -- up to $400 a year for single taxpayers and up to $800 for couples filing jointly. For singles, the credit begins phasing out at an adjusted gross income of $75,000 and dries up completely at $95,000. For couples filing jointly, the phaseout is $150,000 to $190,000 of adjusted gross income (AGI). The IRS won't mail out rebate checks. Instead, it will issue revised withholding tables in March, so the annual benefit of the credit will be crammed into nine months of paychecks. That will automatically boost paychecks for those eligible by $10-$20 a week. Self-employeds can claim the credit on the tax returns they'll file early next year. In the interim, they can reduce their estimated tax payments for 2009.
  • A one-time payment to retirees, veterans and the disabled. Because the payroll tax credit only goes to employees and the self-employed, lawmakers chose a different route to spread the benefits to others: Recipients of Social Security benefits, Railroad Retirement benefits, Supplemental Security Income payments and pension and disability benefits from the Veterans' Administration will get checks for $250 no later than June 17. Government retirees, who don't get Social Security, will get a one-time refundable tax credit of $250 in 2009.
  • Excluding some unemployment benefits from taxes. Folks receiving unemployment checks normally must report that money as income. For 2009, they will be allowed to exclude the first $2,400 in benefits received.
  • A broader, bigger earned income credit for low-incomers. A higher trigger for the phase-out of the earned income credit means more couples who file jointly and have children will qualify. Under the stimulus package, the phase-out range starts at $21,420, an increase of $1,880 in 2008. Also this year, the amount of the credit increases, from 40% to 45% of the first $12,750 of earned income for families with three or more children. For 2009 and 2010, the child credit also covers more low-incomers: It's refundable to the extent of 15% of an individual's earned income in excess of $3,000. That figure is $5,500 lower than for 2008.
  • A sweetener for buyers of new vehicles. If you purchase a new car, light truck, SUV, motorcycle or motor home after Feb. 16, 2009, you can deduct the state sales or excise tax you paid on the first $49,500 of the vehicle's cost, even if you don't itemize your deductions. Note, however, that for folks who do take the standard deduction, there will be no additional line item on Form 1040 for the vehicle sales tax. They’ll just add the tax to their standard deduction amount. Upper-incomers beware: The break gets smaller for single taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes over $125,000 and couples over $250,000 and disappears altogether at income levels of $135,000 and $260,000, respectively.
  • An extra incentive for first-home purchasers. The tax package increases the current $7,500 credit for taxpayers buying their first homes to $8,000 for primary residences purchased before Dec. 1, 2009. It also eliminates the requirement that the credit be repaid, as long as the house isn't sold within three years. Buyers in 2009 can elect to claim the credit on their 2008 returns, although IRS has to revise Form 5405 to reflect the $500 hike in the maximum credit as well as the waiver of the credit repayment requirement.
  • Help for students and parents paying for college. The HOPE credit for college costs rises to $2,500 for 2009 and 2010, covering 100% of the first $2,000 of tuition and related expenses per year and 25% of the next $2,000. Other changes: Making the credit available for all four years of college, instead of just two, and allowing it to be used for the cost of books. Higher phase-out triggers -- $80,000 of adjusted gross income for singles and $160,000 of adjusted gross income for married couples. And making 40% of the credit refundable, so low-incomers who pay little or no taxes will actually get money back. Also…allowing tax-free distributions from Sec. 529 college savings plans to cover computer purchases.
  • A bigger incentive to make energy-saving home improvements. The 10% tax credit for energy-saving home improvements climbs to 30% and extends through 2010. Another change: All qualifying properties are subject to a $1,500 cap on the credit rather than the different caps for different types of properties which had been the law. As now, improvements that qualify for the credit include energy-efficient skylights, windows and outer doors, along with energy-saving water heaters, central air conditioners and biomass stoves.
  • And a higher exemption threshold for the alternative minimum tax (AMT). To keep millions of middle-income taxpayers from being forced to pay the alternative minimum tax in 2009, the minimum tax exemptions rise to $70,950 for couples filing jointly and $46,700 for single filers. Without congressional action, the exemptions would have topped out at just $45,000 for couples and $33,750 for singles.

Businesses will also get their share of the tax pie. Among the breaks:

  • Bonus depreciation. Lawmakers revived the special 50% first-year bonus depreciation provision which had ended with 2008, making it applicable to assets bought and placed in service during 2009.
  • Credits in lieu of bonus depreciation. Firms that don't take bonus depreciation can elect to use a portion of their AMT and research and development (R&D) credit carryovers for assets placed in service in 2009. The amount of credit that can be accelerated is capped at $30 million or 6% of a firm's historic AMT and R&D credits, whichever is less.
  • Extension of expensing rules. Another revival by Congress: The higher $25,000 limit on expensing assets by small businesses under Sec. 179 continues through 2009. As before, full expensing can be used until $800,000 of assets are placed in service during the year.
  • Loss carrybacks. Businesses that averaged $15 million or less in gross receipts over the past three years will be allowed to carry back 2008 losses for five years instead of two.
  • Discharge of indebtedness. Certain firms that buy back their debt at a discount will be allowed to defer tax on the forgiven debt for four or five years. After that, they can report the income evenly over five years -- 20% a year. The relief applies to debt repurchased in 2009 and 2010.
  • Extending renewable energy credits. The credits for solar, geothermal, biomass, landfill gas, etc., are continued through 2013.The credit for electricity derived from wind is extended through 2012.
  • A new 30% manufacturing investment tax credit for putting capital into advanced energy facilities, such as those that make components for producing renewable energy, advanced battery technology and the like.
  • An expansion of the Work Opportunity Credit to cover businesses that hire out-of-work youths between the ages of 16 and 25 or unemployed veterans.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (14)

Posted by: Angela M at 02/13/2009 05:28:37 PM

I'm terribly confused by the changes to the homebuyer credit -- my husband and I are closing on our first house in two weeks, and would have been able to claim the existing credit on our 2008 tax return. But if the credit amount changes with the passage of this bill, we now can't claim it on last year's return? (I'd rather take the $7500 and be able to claim it!) I didn't see any language in the bill changing this feature of the credit, so I am wondering where this information is coming from.

Posted by: Sherry at 02/14/2009 11:02:08 AM

There could be no better investment in America than to invest in America becoming energy independent! We need to utilize everything in out power to reduce our dependence on foreign oil including using our own natural resources. Create cheap clean energy, new badly needed green jobs, and reduce our dependence on foreign oil. The high cost of fuel this past year seriously damaged our economy and society. The cost of fuel effects every facet of consumer goods from production to shipping costs. After a brief reprieve gas is inching back up. OPEC will continue to cut production until they achieve their desired 80-100. per barrel. If all gasoline cars, trucks, and SUV's instead had plug-in electric drive trains, the amount of electricity needed to replace gasoline is about equal to the estimated wind energy potential of the state of North Dakota. There is a really good new book out by Jeff Wilson called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence Now.

Posted by: sam spad at 02/15/2009 09:45:46 PM

They keep saying that retirees will get $250. Just when will that happen? No one says anything about when it is to be distributed to the retirees. Does anyone know?

Posted by: kirk at 02/16/2009 10:42:25 AM

To Sam Spad, they indicate that the SS checks will come sometime this summer. Since they really don't define it further, sometime in the next 7 months I guess

Posted by: familyandhome at 02/16/2009 12:43:11 PM

According to Pres. Obama's tax plans: Citizens are divided into one of 3 categories. Poor (under 75,000 income) middle 75,000 to 150,000 and wealthy 150,000 and up. Poor can be those who are working to the best of their ability but do not have skills to obtain higher paid job or those who are unable or unwilling to work. Then middle income workers and working families. Then upper income levels. So basically, if the upper income level is NOT a millionaire, but a working professional working in excess of 50-60 hours that person is being forced to pay taxes for the lower levels at a totally unfair and discriminatory rate. So all those who do not pay taxes and are so anxiously waiting for your tax credit/benefits are actually getting welfare handouts. For those who are disabled and cannot work that is great. For those who did not apply themselves and work it stinks. What a great socialist country sharing the wealth. Now that will only work so long, because eventually, the harder working folks will stop working the additional hours (because it doesn't go in their earnings, but goes to someone else as a free ride) and guess what, the programs will go away or taxes will increase across the board. But the professional is only going to be used for so long. Then they quit, society loses their profession's input and taxes go up as the professional realizes he might as well relax and work less to earn the same amount. So sorry Obama, that is not the way to increase productivity and create jobs. As the professional decreases earnings, he buys less, employs less and spends much less which stops trickling down the pike. Too bad so sad!

Posted by: Gene R at 02/16/2009 03:06:18 PM

Note to Angela M - re-read the comment about the 1st time home buyers credit. The NEW $8,000 credit is MUCH better - not only do you get a credit, but you won't have to repay that credit like you would have if you used the $7,500 credit from last year!

Posted by: fightinphil at 02/16/2009 08:35:21 PM

How come I hear about all these great "breaks" and when I see the details, I never get Jack-squat. I make too much, don't need to buy another home, am not disabled etc...It is better to be unmotivated and not pay your mortgage than bust your A$$ to support the social welfare system.

Posted by: kevin mccormally at 02/16/2009 09:19:38 PM

Note to Angela M. This is Kevin McCormally of Kiplinger's. You CAN claim the new, improved homebuyers' credit on your 2008 return. The change that added $500 to the credit amount and, more importantly, removed the repayment requirement, did not change the provision that allows buyers in 2009 to elect to claim the credit on their 2008 returns. Enjoy the credit! --kevin

Posted by: Jeff Happy at 02/16/2009 09:41:20 PM

What a great country! Those will spend the money, will get some money to spend, and hopefully jump start the economy. What spoiled sports like family&home don't get is that what is good for the economy trickles up as well as down (actually more so). So f&h go out and spend more, you'll help the economy, and maybe you'll feel better about life.

Posted by: Mike at 02/17/2009 10:19:10 AM

How about eliminating AMT altogether for everyone, but better yet, consider this: eliminate all taxes on non-IRA saving accounts (mutual funds). Those investments are bought with after tax money (taxed 1 time), as they grow or brokers buy and sell stocks within the fund and gain are made, you are taxed on the dividends (taxed twice), and when you cash out and actually get the money into your hands, your are taxed again (taxed 3 times). If you have a loss in your fund and your balance drops, say $3,000, and then goes up, even if it doesn't surpass your original balance, you pay tax on that. It's ridiculous and then government squanders the money. I do ok financally, but (as others have stated) the new tax laws don't do anything for me as I struggle to pay my mortgage, my daughter's college tuition, and my monthly bills while worrying if I will have a job next month.

Posted by: PHILLIP at 02/18/2009 06:14:39 PM

If an individual bought a home 4 years ago and still has it(been for sale for 2 years), gets married in 2006, and his wife buys a home in her name in October of 2008, can they claim the credit ? I'm thinking they can not because her spouse owned a home in the past three years. Help !!!!!!!!!

Posted by: chris at 02/19/2009 05:27:56 PM

What is a first-home purchaser? Also, I'm thinking of the change from 7500 to 8000 tax change. Is a first-time home buyer the same as a first-home purchaser? What qualifies for this? Is someone who hasn't bought a home in 3 years or more qualified for this tax benefit and considered a first-time home buyer? Appreciate hearing back from you on this. Thanks Chris Galilei

Posted by: Tom at 02/22/2009 10:20:42 PM

Why should I be penalized for having fought long and hard to retain a good job, making a good income? What says that people making over $100K have it good. They need less relief on industry and government and fewer taxes across the board, not just based in income.

Posted by: The Prober at 03/02/2009 12:24:51 PM

Does the new stimulus bill still require that you not have owned a house in the last three years in order to qualify for the credit? I have not seen it in print. Someone who really knows please comment. Thank You.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Save Money in February

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement