Park It and Plug It
Affordable plug-in cars that will rarely need gasoline in just two years? That's the automakers' goal.
By Jim Ostroff, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter
February 1, 2008
Advertisement
Plug-ins -- autos with batteries that you can recharge nightly -- will likely hit showrooms in two years as manufacturers push to meet new mileage standards. The future plug-ins really are hybrids that average 80 to 100 miles per gallon of gasoline. But the new cars won't need gasoline for most daily commutes and errands. An overnight charge will keep cars running for up to 40 miles without having to tap the gas tank.
First cars off the line: General Motors' Chevy Volt and Saturn Vue Green Line. GM wants to quickly ramp up production to 100,000 plug-ins annually,and by 2015, grow it to a half million vehicles. Toyota also set 2010 as a rollout date for a plug-in Lexus. Others automakers are likely to follow suit.
Sticker prices on the Chevy Volt and Saturn Vue Green Line will be a bit below that of the Prius, which typically sells for $3,000 to $5,000 more than for a comparable gasoline-only powered vehicle, about $18,000.
The surge in the development of plug-ins is prompted by a new energy law requiring automakers' fleets to achieve an average of 35 miles per gallon by 2022. That's about a 40% increase from the current Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) mandate for cars, SUVs, pickup trucks and vans.
Plug-ins are a dramatic break from the automakers' long-running emphasis on muscle cars, SUVs and trucks. They'll continue to build such vehicles, of course, but those vehicles will be modified to be more fuel efficient. These changes along with new plug-in models will help meet new fleet standards. For example, new diesel engines with turbochargers that boost fuel efficiency by one-third will be standard on lumbering pickups and full size SUVs. Meanwhile, engines in smaller SUVs and large cars will be outfitted with direct injection systems that boost gasoline fuel efficiency by 20% to 30%.
"There's no silver bullet, so instead, each automaker will adopt a specific technology that's best suited to the vehicle based on its size, weight and performance consumers expect," says Paul Lacy, manager of technical research for the consulting firm, Global Insight.
GM is pushing to get its plug-ins on the road first in a bid throw its competitors off balance long enough for the automaker to reestablish itself as the industry's unquestioned technology whiz, and recoup its slumping market share. Plug-ins are sure to help GM's bottom line because the Volt and its siblings will have electric drive trains and other systems, letting the automaker slash costs and vehicle weight.
Meanwhile, GM is also looking down the road at the next generation of plug-ins -- hybrid vehicles that burn almost no gasoline. They would run on both battery power and E85 fuel -- a blend of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline. For now, E85 is a nonstarter. Though there's enough ethanol being made to meet refiners' needs for blending into unleaded gasoline, it would be a huge stretch to ramp up ethanol production five-fold to fuel fleets of E85 cars and other vehicles that use regular gas.
GM is betting on a breakthrough that will make ethanol as plentiful as gasoline by investing in Costaka Inc., a company that says it has perfected technologies that will enable it to make large quantities of cellulosic ethanol -- fuel produced from grasses and other plants as well as agricultural waste -- starting in 2011 for around $1 per gallon. "Making ethanol for $1 per gallon isn't just a game changer. It's a whole new ballgame," says David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research, an auto industry consultancy. E85 fuel that retails for even $2 per gallon will steeply undercut gasoline's price and significantly reduce U.S. oil consumption.
Large scale production of E85-powered hybrids is at least a decade away. Auto engineers still have to surmount technical hurdles, including superefficient power and propulsion systems that can put these vehicles' electricity and fuel costs at least on a par with today's gasoline-powered ones. But odds are that the technological advances will come eventually, which is why GM, Toyota and other automakers are researching advanced plug-ins.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


Reader Comments (18)
Posted by: Jim Walker at 02/01/2008 02:32:30 PM
It's a shame it's taking GM, (and Toyota especially), so long to make a plug-in hybrid. GM already had a plug-in all electric in the EV-1, and you can buy an aftermarket kit since last year for a Toyota Prius to make it a plug-in hybrid. For that matter, why is it so hard to combine that with E85? GM already has several of those as well. Because they don't want to.
Posted by: Nomen at 02/01/2008 07:56:10 PM
This is good news even if it is a few years late in coming. I want an electric car with a small turbodiesel generator for longer trips. Forget the E85 unless it is totally made from cellulosic ethanol which unfortunately still won't have near the energy per volume as a gallon of biodiesel. Biodiesel will likely push E85 clear out of the market in ten years and maybe much sooner.
Posted by: LarryWilson at 02/02/2008 08:51:29 AM
What does it cost in electricity to plug this in? What effect does this have on increased pollution created by utility companies? Has anyone calculated this?
Posted by: Mac at 02/02/2008 09:04:53 AM
With the current administrations relationship with the oil companies they would be crazy to offend either one. After all why didn't they sell the EV instead of leasing? Because tey would not have been able to control it and eventually kill it as they did.
Posted by: gnubi at 02/02/2008 04:10:25 PM
Ethanol still looks idiotic to me. Less energy returned it takes to produce AND it drives up food costs as well. Plug-in vehicles are no use when our electrical production and distribution barely keeps up with current demand (no pun intended). The ONLY answer to all these problems is more nuclear power.
Posted by: Greg Iafeliece at 02/02/2008 07:02:22 PM
E85 is not the answer. It costs more to produce, does not return the 'energy', and without the government subsidy it would be more expensive than gasoline per gallon. Especially when dealing with ethanol from corn which makes food costs go up. I also echo the prior comments and say watch "Who killed the electric car" and then try not to kill the auto makers and oil idustrialists (exxon had a profit in excess of 40 billion last year)...
Posted by: madmilker at 02/03/2008 10:25:07 AM
well, Jim...guess my first comment raised more than one eyebrow and like most that I send went in file 13. Not many today remember having to drive at 55mph on a Interstate highway and even less remember mandatory gas rationing "A, B, C, X" from December 1, 1942 to August 15, 1945 with a speed limit of 35mph. Chrysler made fuselages. General Motors made airplane engines, guns, trucks and tanks. Packard made Rolls-Royce engines for the British air force. And lets not leave out Ford turning out one B-24 Liberator long-range bomber that had 1,550,000 parts every 63 minutes. It really is amazing that the hydrogen-fueled internal combustion vehicle has been around since 1807 and Germany had a thousand running the streets doing World War II but after 200 years "oil" still rules. What if today... the United States of America sold "Petroleum War Bonds" to individuals and the GM,Chrysler and Ford's of the World get off their lazy a!!.....oops! this one ain't gonna make it either! dang!
Posted by: mfrnd at 02/04/2008 08:28:56 AM
Do it! It's a start in the right direction even if it's not the final answer.
Posted by: Toxicdave at 02/04/2008 10:16:53 AM
I would be one of the first in line to purchase one of these vehicles. I only drive a short distance to work (I bike in the warmer months). I really like the idea of a small turbo diesel instead of a gas engine. Someone needs to mention that to GM (might be a weight issue). I’ve shied away from the gas/hybrid cars because my driving habits don’t support the regenerative breaking to recharge the batteries. I would like to drive a plug in to work and charge it there – just for the irony that I work at a large oil refinery in California!
Posted by: RoS at 02/05/2008 08:13:05 AM
The next step is for the car makers to replace the conventional sunroof with one that is a photovoltaic array to recharge the batteries while it sits outside all the work day in a parking lot. I live 22 miles from work, so 40 mile range will almost get me home. Just a little bit of 'sun-power' during the day and I could make it both ways ...
Posted by: Jim Ostroff at 02/07/2008 07:17:25 PM
This is Jim Ostroff, the article's author. There is one point that needs to be addressed head on: The notion that there is a cabal, a hidden hand, that prevents plug-in electric hybrid cars, or other advanced technologies from being brought to market. In reality, the force that drives such decisions is the marketplace--consumers. Gasoline-powered vehicles that get 30-40 mpg have been available for years. Automakers have sold them, but all things considered, not many. Around 75% of consumers buy SUVs, light trucks, vans and larger cars. Neither automakers nor oil companies are forcing consumers' hands or denying them a choice. Plug-ins and fuel cell-powered cars have been around for a while. Why don't automakers sell them? Few will buy them at prices of $100,000 and more. Technical advances make it likely that plug-ins can be made and sold at prices approaching gasoline-powered models by about 2010. GM is taking a gamble in committing to do so. All things considered, small turbo-diesel-powered vehicles might be more economical. Don't forget, you pay for electricity. A nationwide fleet of electric cars is out of the realm of possibility. The U.S.'s electricity infrastructure could not handle the additional load. GM and other automakers are producing vehicles now that can run on gasoline or E85. It is not clear that E85 will ever be the primary fuel for autos. If the number of vehicles on the road never increased, the U.S. would need about 120 billion gallons of ethanol a year to fuel them. About 8 billion gallons will be made this year. The U.S. also would need to completely transform its fuel delivery network, retrofit thousands of gas stations with new underground tanks and pumps. Doing so will require billions of dollars in new spending and approval of thousands of environmental applications, individually.
Posted by: Lex Palmer at 02/08/2008 09:34:19 AM
Wrong: There is more than enough electricity. Most people will charge their cars at night, off peak, and there is more than enough spare night time electricity to charge EVERY car in America, if it was switched to a plug-in hybrid. Utility companies are chomping at the bit for this, as their business will BOOM! Wrong #2: E85 will cost money to retrofit pipelines, tankers, delivery systems, etc, yes. Billions. However, we ship OVER 450 billion dollars a year overseas for foreign petroleum, etc. Plus, this doesn't include what the transportation to get it here costs. Or the cost of our military to protect these trade lanes, etc. Those carrier groups that cruise the Persian Gulf, etc, they cost BIG money. Imagine if that was reduced in cost/scope? How much more could be spent on US infrastructure upgrades? Switching to Plug-in Hybrids and E85 will be a huge boon to the US economy, and help with pollution and global warming etc.
Posted by: Statik at 02/08/2008 10:53:49 AM
Sticker prices on the Chevy Volt and Saturn Vue Green Line will be a bit below that of the Prius, which typically sells for $3,000 to $5,000 more than for a comparable gasoline-only powered vehicle, about $18,000" Holy fact checking skills! Hard to put much stock in the rest of your article when you are clearly just pulling numbers out of thin air. Volt is 35-40K right now and estimates are on the uptrend.
Posted by: Nomen at 02/12/2008 01:15:04 PM
To Mr. Jim Ostroff, I partially agree with your comments but they ignore the changing dynamic of increasing fuel prices and the fact that Global warming is just now being accepted as a real threat by the general public. In the past the auto and oil companies have definitely tried to keep us buying more luxurious and powerful gas guzzling cars because of a higher profit margin. Their not so secret cabal (advertising) definitely influences what consumers want and buy. Most of the American economy cars offered during the past 30 years have been of very low quality,poorly designed and poorly promoted. When gas was cheaper why would anyone buy them to save just a few dollars? We now have a different energy situation which the auto and oil companies have long known was coming. Their lack of preparation is their own fault and to blame the public's buying habits (which they helped shape)is ludicrous. Also, a nationwide fleet of electric vehicles is not out of the realm of possibility. To further cut CO2 emissions, it will become an absolute necessity. While so many are trying to profit from alternate forms of energy, the simplest solution is almost totally ignored. CONSERVATION!!! If everyone switched to CFL lighting,high efficiency appliances and smaller turbo diesel vehicles,we could cut energy consumption in half with current technology. Future technology and spending could then be focused on totally electric cars and green sources of energy to power them and the rest of our economy.
Posted by: Jim Ostroff at 02/15/2008 06:48:41 PM
Jim Ostroff: The group that was established by Congress to ride herd over the electric utility industry, as well as private analysts, have warned several regions of the country face increased risk of blackouts, due to very thin supply margins, as early as this year. Hot summer nights or frigid winter ones strain power supplies. Adding megawatts of demand to recharge plug-ins at night likely would overtax power supplies in several areas. The power transmission situation being what it is, there are no guarantees power could be purchased to make up the shortfall. In fact, most electric power companies are working to slow the growth of electricity usage-- not increase it. Regarding E85 infrastructure development: The U.S. will not fund projects to build pipelines or delivery systems, regardless of who controls Congress and the White House. This will have to be done by private industry, or not at all. Prices for the Chevy Volt are meaningless now. They will be a lot lower once GM starts mass production. Kiplinger has said many times that automakers for years have had the techs needed to boost vehicles' mpg substantially. Why have they not done so? The vast majority of consumers don't care. High pump prices have not dented gasoline purchases. The easy answer is to say this all is Madison Ave.'s doing--the invisible hand of the hidden persuaders. A bit too easy. Is it really advertising, or societal trends that has led a vast segment of the consuming public to demand SUVs, pickups, super-sized meals in fast-food restaurant and white linen ones, homes that are twice the average size they were a generation ago, movie screen-size TVs, more than one telephone per capita for every person living in the U.S.?
Posted by: Nome at 02/18/2008 02:13:54 PM
Mr. Jim Ostroff. While you are partially right about some areas facing power shortages and would currently have difficulty supporting large numbers of plug-in electric cars, I feel that once again the potential savings from conservation are being ignored and the fact that more green power generation (including nuclear)will be coming on line in the coming years. Last year I easily reduced my own electric usage by 30% by going to CFL lighting and an energy efficient furnace and air conditioner. I now look forward to getting my first electric car and am already researching solar electric panels and a small wind generator to provide a large portion of the battery charging separate from the power grid. As far as buying trends being affected by advertising are concerned, companies wouldn't be spending such huge amounts of money promoting manly pickups and luxurious SUVs if it didn't have a major effect on shaping purchases. When the cabal includes football players and beautiful women driving cool looking electric cars, I'm sure we will see a new market develop. Most people ARE followers. The bottom line is that we absolutely must reduce our huge CO2 emissions before we even consider reducing what's already in the atmosphere. Either the days of the CO2 emitting auto are numbered or the days of our civilization will be. I am a retired scientist with no employer telling me what to say. As more scientific information is gathered daily, the potential effects of Global Warming only look more grim. While there are still many unknowns, the trends only continue to be more alarming.
Posted by: Gary at 03/01/2008 12:46:50 PM
Mr. Jim Ostroff, I'm sorry I'm reading your article too late, but there seems to be an error in it. I do not believe that the Volt and Vuw sticker prices will be below the Prius. Both the Volt and Vuw will sticker for more than $30,000.
Posted by: terry at 11/04/2008 12:31:55 AM
i am so tired of hearing bout the environment.....i'll choose a regular car over electric anyday