Obama Administration to Shift Regulatory Approach

President Obama is putting his stamp on regulatory policy, moving quickly to reverse some Bush-era rules and laying the groundwork for more far-reaching changes.

By Richard Sammon, Senior Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

Martha Lynn Craver, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

February 5, 2009
Text Size T T

Advertisement

The Obama administration will move swiftly on establishing a new regulatory environment by making new regulations and reversing existing rules that affect business and commerce. Among the first acts of the new administration was putting a 180-day hold on all regulatory actions near completion, but not finalized, to allow the new regulatory staff time to review and halt or change them.

A much more active and engaged workplace safety regime is expected at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, for instance. Unlike the Bush administration, which emphasized compliance assistance and cooperation with business, the Obama administration will put a heavier hand on enforcement, following through with blunt warnings and penalties.

Many ignored rules will be dusted off and put back on track. They include:

  • An ergonomics rule to protect workers from repetitive motion injuries.
  • Regulating exposure to beryllium, which is used in dental work, aerospace and computers and is associated with lung disease.
  • A revision of the Permissible Exposure Limits -- a list of more than 400 toxic chemicals that has not been revised in about 40 years.
  • A rule to protect health workers from tuberculosis.
  • Regulating the levels of silica, the tiny fibrous material in cement and stone dust that causes lung disease and cancer.
  • Regulation of hazardous exposure to ionizing radiation in mailrooms, food warehouses, hospitals and airports.

The new administration will also be working to reverse a spate of the Bush administration's final regulatory changes from late last year and in early January on health, labor and environmental regulations. However, many may stay on the books for a while. Overturning them takes time and often requires lengthy reviews and public comment periods. Regulations, once finalized, can't be removed by executive order, and efforts by Congress to overturn them can be difficult.

Among rules in effect that are being eyed for revision or removal are ones that:

  • Ease restrictions on how large factory farms report air pollution emissions from animal waste.
  • Permit several types of hazardous waste to be reclassified as fuel, which allows it to be burned instead of being disposed of in more restricted manners.
  • Require states to accept bids from private companies whenever they reorganize toll road management and operations or transfer operating authority of toll roads from one agency to another.
  • Shorten mandatory rest times between work weeks for commercial truckers.
  • Open up for leasing and oil shale development 2 million acres of western public lands.
  • Allow waste from mountaintop coal mining to be disposed in riverbeds.
  • Lift a 25-year-old ban on carrying loaded weapons into national parks.
  • Require labor unions to file extensive additional annual financial reports on pensions and trusts.
  • Remove federal oversight of a regulation requiring rail cars to reroute around densely populated areas. Oversight of the rule is left to the railroad industry.
  • Open large portions of national forests in Idaho to logging and road building.
  • Reduce access of Medicaid beneficiaries to dental and vision care.
  • Lift a requirement that federal land-use managers consult with biological health experts before approving development projects that may affect an endangered species habitat.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (6)

Posted by: gina at 02/05/2009 12:52:50 PM

Excellent! I would also like to see some change in assuring the quality of our food supply. Not just bacteria, but irradiation and genetically modified foods.

Posted by: Gigi at 02/06/2009 11:02:10 AM

Why would we lift a ban on loaded weapons in national parks? Or open national forests to logging and road building? Let's preserve some peace and serenity, not to mention precious green space.

Posted by: Sarah Jordan at 02/17/2009 01:32:34 PM

All of the ones to be changed just make good common sense and can only serve all the public's good, whether Republican or Democrat. The Golden Rule if only applied would solve so many problems. I feel ill when I visualize coal waste being dumped in pristine streams and then bleeding into the ground to affect the drinking water of local people. The sooner the better for these changes to be made.

Posted by: Nancy Eckert at 03/16/2009 08:17:07 AM

My I rerun this article in our local Magazine? Nancy Eckert DC Metropolitan Subcontractors Assoc. 703-366-3666

Posted by: christine at 03/16/2009 01:56:13 PM

Ergonomics regulation is needed because employers are not doing enough to combat debilitating injuries due to repetitive motion. These type of injuries are very preventable when caught early. Less employees will suffer needlessly when employers get "direction" from OSHA on ergonomics.

Posted by: Mark at 09/15/2009 05:10:19 PM

Over-bearing regulations only puts pressure on businesses to lower wages, increase cost of their products, drive them out of business, or force them to set up shop in other countries with less restrictions. Regulations is just a fancy word for facism.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Extra Cash for the Holidays

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement