Kennedy Working Now for January Health Care Push

The ailing senator and his staff are moving quickly on a proposal likely to build on the existing concept of employer-based coverage.

By Martha Lynn Craver, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

September 25, 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Congress will lead the way on health care reform next year, not waiting for the next president, whoever he turns out to be. And key backers of a move toward universal coverage don't plan to waste any time either. Among the lessons learned from the last major attempt at health care reform in 1993 is that it needs to be tackled in the first year of the new Congress during the "honeymoon period" -- just after the election and before everyone starts focusing on the next campaign.

Sen. Ted Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat who has long championed health issues, plans to be ready in January, and he's determined not to let his own health issues keep him from being at the forefront of what will be difficult negotiations. Kennedy, who is chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, is a man in a hurry. He wants to hit the ground running, introducing a plan soon after the new Congress convenes in January.

His goal: affordable and accessible health care for all. Kennedy is well liked on Capitol Hill, and there's a big emotional push to get this done "for Ted." Kennedy and his staff have already held meetings with his Republican counterpart on the Committee, Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY), in hopes of crafting a bipartisan bill that will win broad support. Kennedy has a reputation for reaching across the aisle, and he and Enzi have partnered a number of times on other health care issues. But if the talks fall through, expect Kennedy to introduce a bill on his own and try to win bipartisan backing later.

Kennedy is also working with other committees in finance and budget jurisdictions committees, to ensure their cooperation so that the bill isn't bogged down by jurisdictional issues -- another lesson learned from the '93 battle. Major stakeholders are being called in as well -- business, labor, medical, insurance and consumer groups -- to sound them out on potential approaches. Also, Kennedy has added John McDonough to his staff -- he was in charge of implementing Massachusetts' groundbreaking universal health care law.

What will the proposal look like? Talks so far are just preliminary, with the more serious work to be done after the November election. But the betting is that it will seek to build on the employer-based system that now provides coverage for 177 million people. Universal coverage will be the goal, although it may have to be phased in, thanks to federal deficits likely to rise due to the financial crisis. The idea will be to make health care coverage available to all who want it, but not mandatory.

Getting coverage for the 46 million uninsured will focus on strengthening public programs such as Medicaid as well as providing more affordable options to people through the private insurance market.

Cost containment will be a big part of reform. Examples where there's great potential for agreement include:

  • Health care IT to cut down on medical errors and duplicative tests.
  • Comparable health effectiveness research to determine which treatments deliver the most bang for the buck.
  • Generic versions of biotech drugs as an alternative for costly brand-name biotech pharmaceuticals.
  • Pay-for-performance initiatives, to reward the best and most efficient caregivers.
  • Wellness programs and disease management to better control chronic diseases, such as diabetes and asthma.

How to finance the plan will be the biggest challenge. The tax treatment of health insurance will be on the table, but it's unclear if it will be in Kennedy's bill. Big revisions to the tax code are unlikely, and there may be a cap on the health insurance tax exemption for high earners.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (9)

Posted by: arthur kramer at 09/25/2008 10:30:52 AM

What is being done about the shortage of primary physicans. Even if people are covered they must have access to the primary doctor for treatment and or referral to othe doctors.

Posted by: Alan at 09/25/2008 08:48:53 PM

This will be the 3rd and final nail in the coffin of a free America. The passage of universal health care will officially usher in the United Socialist States of America. The ideals of our founding fathers will be thrown out the window. There are many reasons this won't work. First, it will cost 5 to 10 times or more than the government projects. Just look back to Johnson's Great Society for reference. We have open borders so we'll insure the world! Access will be restricted for all because the system will be overwhelmed. Rationing will then occur. The government will be able decide who gets care and what kind of care you get...so don't get old or chronically ill. If doctors are mandated to see universal health patients, they will be forced out of business. Oh and if they are told to see them...that's fascism...usually something that follows socialism. Taxes will go from a marginal rate of 25% to something like 36%...oh and you thought we were only going to tax the rich, small business, and big business. It's time for Americans to wake up and begin critically thinking about what Washington is doing to the country. They are like crack dealers. They entice you with something that may sound good and harmless but in the end hurts us all.

Posted by: Mike at 09/25/2008 10:08:46 PM

Just say NO to Socialism

Posted by: Nancy at 09/26/2008 05:39:32 PM

Is Kennedy crazy? Oh, I forgot, he has brain cancer. Not that I don't sympathize with him, but we're working on a $700 billion bailout of our economy. NOW HE WANTS TO INSTITUTE NATIONALIZED HEALTHCARE? Typical Dem/Lib/Socialist/Communism. Nationalized healthcare doesn't work for the poor or the elderly...they get put on long waiting lists and told when or whether they can have necessary surgery. The only ones it works for are people with money who can buy their way up the list. Why do you think Canadians come here for their medical care? Why do you think Canadian doctors are moving here?

Posted by: John at 09/26/2008 05:58:55 PM

No question changes must occur but: Some 8 million of the uninsureds don't even know they have access; many uninsureds satisfy wants before needs so refuse to buy or don't think they need unless it's "free"; and why this will work when Medicare is going broke and the reimbursments to docs are so low many refuse Medicare patients is beyond me. Members of Congress are out of the loop with their own special system.

Posted by: Mark at 09/27/2008 04:44:29 PM

I would be willing to bet that all of those who call access to healthcare socialism, fall into the healthy and/or wealthy category. However, corporate welfare, farmer welfare, subsidies for autos and green energy, Wall Street bailouts, those of course are necessary and are not socialism are they? We already have a quasi-socialist sytem, it just doesn't include health care.

Posted by: Allan Krueger at 09/27/2008 09:48:23 PM

Who cares as long as you have healthcare - right Alan? That is the same lame argument that has been made for decades and look at the mess we are in! Has the Post Office made us a Socialist State? What's next on your agenda?

Posted by: What the...?! at 09/27/2008 11:06:33 PM

Wow, have you heard how badly this is going? It is SCARY! And if you haven't your not alone. It is next to impossible to Google news articles about it. When has Google NOT been able to find anything?

Posted by: john smith at 10/07/2008 02:30:13 PM

Health care and housing should not be "industries" where greedy people can make unlimited profits. Some engagements should be for the betterment of your fellow man not for your own enrichment. The problem here is selfishness. Like children that don't want to share their toys in kindergarden, you greedy people don't want to share anything, you want all the toys for yourself. The solution is the same as it should be for kids that are selfish; punishment. No toys for you. In essence no private property for profit for you or unlimited money from health care; maybe if we take it away you'll learn some ethics. Either way its happening right now, with the credit crisis. What needs to be done is just throw out the debt and let the people have a right to housing; to hell with the landlords and the banks...too bad for them. Let them get what they deserve; punishment for being greedy.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Save Money in February

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement