GOP Presidential Race: Is Fred Thompson for Real?

It's late and it won't be easy, but the stars may be aligned for the actor to have a serious run at the White House.

By Richard Sammon, Senior Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

April 20, 2007
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Fred Thompson is nearly ready to run for president, a prospect that would change the 2008 presidential race overnight. Revealing earlier this month that he has lymphoma in remission was a preparatory move, lowering the risk that the health issue might derail the campaign. His visit with Republican lawmakers this week to hear their thoughts on his running was also an indication that he is seriously inclined.

Republicans are already enthused about Thompson, an actor-turned-senator-turned-actor, who is better known to Americans than most other candidates. Speculation and media interest are keeping his star on the rise. He's running second in GOP polls, just behind ex-New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and ahead of Arizona Sen. John McCain. It's an enviable position to be in, considering he has done essentially no campaigning or fund-raising.

Sure, some of that is due to name recognition from years in movies and on TV in macho roles, but it's also a reflection of the fact that 60% of Republicans say nobody else in the presidential race is really grabbing them.

Still, a run won't be easy. Thompson is late to the money chase. His voting record representing Tennessee in the Senate from 1994 through 2002 won't please all Republicans, particularly his support of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance legislation that banned large soft money donations to the national parties. He'd have to deal with much wider media scrutiny if he ran, too, as well as negative opposition research from other candidates. Also, others may jump in: Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia and Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska will wait until fall to decide whether to run.

Raising money would be the chief initial concern for Thompson. Close to $100 million is needed to be considered a credible national candidate in preparation for the front-packed primaries early next year. Thompson would have to score very well in the earliest tests in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, and that requires organization.

Internet fund-raising would be critical to his campaign at first, allowing him to show broad appeal and to rise to the money level of other major candidates in the Republican race who have been raising, but also spending, for months now. A few single mega fund-raisers could also put him right in contention and possibly strip support from McCain, Giuliani and former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney in the process.

Unlike McCain, Thompson is not inextricably linked to the war in Iraq. That could help with Republicans who have grown frustrated with the Bush administration's war policy. He also has a generally conservative voting record that appeals to many Republicans who question the conservative credentials of the other top candidates. Hailing from the South is also a plus, as it has been in many modern presidential campaigns.

A Thompson brain trust? For a campaign, at least, he would be able to assemble a formidable and well-connected team, including former Senate Majority Leaders Howard Baker and Bill Frist and Sen. Lamar Alexander, all from Tennessee, as well as Tennessee GOP Reps. Zach Wamp and John Duncan, both of whom have been working on a draft Thompson publicity campaign.

A decision by Thompson could come in a few weeks. He has several speaking engagements to Republican groups coming up in early May. These events are possibly the perfect opportunities for an announcement tour.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (17)

Posted by: David Glick at 04/20/2007 10:52:04 AM

If Thompson decides to run, he will get a momentary blip in the polls by those fools who are star struck, but even that will eventually fade as Republicans come to their senses and see that there are candidates already running who are far more qualified than Thompson. The 60% of the Republican party who are not satisfied with any of the candidates had better figure out pretty soon that there are no perfect candidates. Have conservatives becomes so rigid, that they can't look beyond superficial things. Take Romney's Mormonism - I personally find it shocking that 30% of Repubs. say they would never vote for him because of it. A sad commentary on Republican intolerance, when more liberals are willing to vote for a Mormon, or a woman, black, etc.., than those who are supposed to be compassionate, etc., And yes, I myself am a Republican, though considering switching to Independant if my party doesn't get it.

Posted by: Richard Sammon at 04/20/2007 01:52:36 PM

Hello David and other readers. David Glick has a point questioning why so many Republicans are not enthused with the current field. What are some names of other people who you would like to have seen enter the race? -- Richard Sammon, Kiplinger.

Posted by: Jason at 04/20/2007 02:02:28 PM

A fair comment - I think that he is enjoying what Obama did for a long time too (and really, still is)- the media is so interested in his running that they aren't interested in asking him real questions. I doubt very much if he can mount a serious campaign simply because of the money. To be fair to him, I really don't know how he stands on anything. You are right about our party though. I don't think it has to do with intolerance, I think Republicans are always on the search for a custom-fit candidate in an off-the-rack world.

Posted by: Darth Rosenberg at 04/20/2007 02:06:21 PM

"willing to vote for a Mormon, or a woman, black, etc..," wow...

Posted by: Lyle Latvala at 04/20/2007 03:11:12 PM

What does all this 'excitement' over another candidate coming into the race mean? It means no one is happy with the current candidates! Whether one is looking at the Republican or the Democratic candidates, there simply is no real enthusism - they're all tweedle dumb, tweedle dee. Everyone so far seems to be offering more of the same. 'More of the same' has gotten us into the fix we're in, and radical solutions will be needed over the next 20 years to take care of the coming fiscal tsunami. Personally, show me a candidate willing to address REAL issues, and speak MEANINGFULLY about those issues, and I'll seriously consider him or her.

Posted by: Robert W. Watson at 04/20/2007 03:47:02 PM

It has been a hard-and-fast rule that I never contribute to politicians. If Fred Thompson decides to make a run for the presidency, I will break that hard-and-fast rule. He in my opinion is the perfect candidate for this blue-collar democrat who continues to wait for my party to run someone for whom I can vote and become enthused about. I do not see this election cycle and am hopeful that the Republicans will nominate Thompson. It is sad for me to say that the last time I was enthused to be a Democrat was weeks before Clinton demonstrated his unworthiness to be our president. Of course before that, it was JFK. RWW

Posted by: William McBrayer Woo at 04/20/2007 04:47:33 PM

You should also comment that this attorney Thompson was Republican Counsel to the in the Watergate hearings and Nixon impeachment hearings. He did not just jump out of the woodwork, he was a well developed lawyer with keen training. He is articulate and thinks in chess moves and not in checkers moves.

Posted by: Bill Pharis at 04/20/2007 04:53:39 PM

It would be hard for anyone to get enthusiastic about the republican field largely in part that the media in general is so skewed that they always harp on the negative when it comes to Republican candidates and then turn most of the coverage over to the liberal losers like Obama and Clinton. Luckily for me, those two make me so ill that I am truly worried that are nation might be lead by them that just about anybody nominated by the Republicans would work out better for me and our country by estimation. Glick mentions that Thompson is not overly qualified for the job which is very true but has anyone taken a look at Obama talk about nothing, he barely had to have a campaign to win his current seat and brings virtually nothing to the table when it comes to qualifications. Hillary brings some qualification but really she is still riding Bill's legacy which is not one that I am inclined to roll with in my life time.

Posted by: Lance at 04/20/2007 11:34:28 PM

Most Americans are oriented towards basic values that have been cherished for generations. Fred Thompson appears to be a basic values kind of guy who could possibly help give some hope in a rather dismal field of candidates from both parties.

Posted by: Mark Bullock at 04/21/2007 11:18:42 AM

I don't think Fred Thompson is qualified to be president. Yes, for the most part he has conservative ideals, but he lacks meaningful executive experience, and the President of of the US is not the place for a first time leader. On top of that, I question whether he has it in him to work endless days for the next 10 years, especially given the fact that he has a new family with two kids under the age of 5 years old. I think the thought of being President excites him, but the actual reality of being President doesn't. He is better off staying in acting or radio. It pays more and allows him the time to deal with his young family and cancer.

Posted by: Dean Seigneur at 04/21/2007 02:17:51 PM

Fred Thompson for President teamed with conservative African-American J.C. Watts, Dr. Alan Keyes or Ken Blackwell would be an excellent team against the probable Clinton-Obama team.

Posted by: Philip Bailey at 04/21/2007 08:55:00 PM

Fred Thompson is the ideal candidate for 2008. Giuliani has too many skeltons in his closet, not to mention his problems with the Pro-Life and Second Amendment communities. Romney's problem is not that he is a Mormon, but that he is a Northeast Liberal pretending to be a social conservative. John McCain is simply stuck and many of us do not trust him. Fred Thompson on the other hand is a relatively fresh face with solid conservative credentials. He is able to project the presidential imagae and sense of command that Ronald Reagan did. It is obvious to anyone studying him for even for a few minutes. Fred Thompson is the only candidate that can unite the Republicans and hand the Democrats a serious defeat. Can you imagine a debate between Thompson and whoever the Dems nominate? By comparison to Fred Thompson the Democrats have a serious 'gavitas' deficit.

Posted by: Archibald Luxor at 04/21/2007 10:34:49 PM

We need another Republican actor as the president as we need Alzheimer's Disease.

Posted by: Joseph J Honick at 04/21/2007 11:21:00 PM

In many ways this political dissection of Thompson is amusing and sad at the same time. Amusing because it makes clear the reality few Republicans are much enthusiastic about any of the declared GOP candidates, no matter how much money they have. Sad, because of the same reasons but also because the American public now has a record of buying into imagery, especially that of film stars, imputing to them the character of the characters they portray. Of all those so far, however, Thompson has the most substance. He is not the avuncular aw-shucks of Reagan but has much more experience. What is actually emerging in this newest "silly season" is the unfortunate lack of much to choose from across all candidates declared and thought about. That is both sad...and very dangerous for our reputations abroad and at home.

Posted by: Tony at 04/22/2007 12:40:07 AM

Fred Thompson has my financial support, my vote and I will campaign for him. He is an excellent choice for President of the United States. He is the right canidate at the right time for the American People. Hopefully, he will anounce in the coming weeks. His trip to Orange County California to speak at the Linclon Club would be an excellent opportunity to enter the race and set the pace for 2008.

Posted by: Jacqui Conley at 04/22/2007 05:32:59 PM

Fred Thompson is the closest we will come to another Reagan in the foreseeable future. He was my senator, and could pick up his seat whenever he might choose. The people of TN have great respect for him, unlike our other former senator. Gore couldn't even carry the state in 2000. We knew him too well. To David: No, most would not be "star struck", just recognizing experience and true leadership ability.

Posted by: Estelle Diamond at 04/23/2007 12:11:25 PM

Cancer , even in remission, is not a plus for a Presidential candidate. Im sure the Republican Party is bouncing around looking for a vice-Presidential running mate for Mr Thompson...The country already has suffered with an impossible pair in the white House... to begin a new Presidency with an ax hanging over one's head is a sign of desperation on the part of the RNC.

Today's Video More Videos >>

Turning Allowances Into Savings

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement