Energy Prices Are Headed Lower -- Really

Amid the wild volatility, a better supply and demand dynamic is developing. But even after prices fall, conservation will endure.

By Jim Ostroff, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter

June 11, 2008
Text Size T T

Advertisement

Oil prices continue to gyrate, but the longer-term trend is gradually down as the commodities bubble slowly deflates. Volatility will remain high. Still, look for oil prices to fall about 30% to around $100 per barrel by the end of the year.

And look for gasoline to dip to $3.45 a gallon by December, down about 14% from this month's high. Why? Demand is falling, the same way it did in 1979 and 1980, when pain at the pump slashed U.S. gas use by 5% and 6%, respectively.

Miles traveled in the U.S. plunged by 4.3% in March alone. In the last week of May, the peak summer driving season's kick off, gasoline purchases slid 3.9% from the same week a year ago. In cities and regions from New York to Los Angeles, where pump prices are well north of the current $4-a-gallon national average, gas retailers are reporting a 5% to 10% drop in fuel purchases, says John Kilduff, a senior vice president with MF Global, a commodities trading firm.

Consumer habits are changing, too. The biggest switch is to smaller cars and away from large SUVs and pickup trucks. Four-cylinder engines made up 45% of May sales, up from 30% in May 2005. Energy is also a more important factor to many consumers when it comes to purchases of home appliances.

The U.S. isn't alone in reducing energy consumption or changing habits. When government subsidies in many Asian nations disappear by year's end, demand will slacken. China, which has been stockpiling supplies for the coming Olympics, will likely shift gears and cut back on its energy purchases by August.

A strengthening dollar will help although its moves will be volatile, too. But the buck's gradual recovery will lessen the need for oil producers to keep prices high on crude, their primary greenback-denominated export.

The supply situation is improving, too. "The Saudis haven't trumpeted the news, but their oil exports are up by 300,000 barrels a day and U.S. refineries are operating at about 88% of capacity, helping to increase fuel supplies," says Kilduff. That's up from nearly 80% a few months ago. Modest production growth, mostly from Russia, is another positive.

The upshot: a better supply and demand dynamic, as oil supplies move from a deficit of 900,000 barrels a day that had to be made up by dipping into reserves, to a global cushion in production capacity of 600,000 barrels a day.

But demand destruction and increased supplies tell only half the story. Close to 50% of the price drop will come from speculative froth subsiding. The rush of money into commodity investments has slowed. Big bets on oil will ebb amid U.S. regulatory probes of speculative trading and more clear-cut evidence of plunging demand.

Prices likely will zig and zag wildly in coming months, until traders endure enough pain to persuade them that the sky is not the limit for oil prices. "Despite some investment banks [such as Lehman Brothers] warning oil will top $150 a barrel, the bull oil market may well be in its final stage before a price blow-off that could take prices below $100, [perhaps] down to $85," says Phil Flynn, a vice president with Alaron Trading, a commodities trading firm.

Yet few are forecasting any long-term, lasting collapse in prices, the kind of decades-long trough that followed spikes in 1979 and 1980. Supplies just can't be increased as much or as quickly as they were back then. And wringing out major energy inefficiencies is a lot tougher today. There was plenty of low-hanging fruit to pick a couple of decades ago. That's no longer the case.

But pricking the commodities bubble will sure feel good. To the relief of central bankers worldwide, it'll reduce inflationary pressures, giving consumers and businesses a break and encourage spending and investing. That's just what the ailing economy needs.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

Discuss

Reader Comments (8)

Posted by: Tommy Moss at 06/11/2008 10:57:21 PM

Having worked in the oil industry for the last 15 years I can only partially agree with this article. Prices may subside in the near term due to demand destruction. But worldwide production will not increase much, if at all. The easy oil is gone. I've done a lot of research on this topic and oil will soon become extremely expensive. Oil companies and oil producing nations are not growing production. At best they are merely sustaining current production levels. And the industry as a whole is spending record levels in trying to maintain current production levels. $200/bbl oil is closer than you think. And it will go much higher. There are no viable alternatives to replace it in large enough quantities to prevent worldwide economic shock. I don't want to sound alarmist. The facts are available for those who want to know the reality versus the hype. The concept of peak oil is true. I produce oil for a living. In Alaska. Our rates are declining 10+%/year despite massive investments. Those of us in the business know the truth. Shame on us for electing a Congress that refuses to do what's best for the country. Keep in mind that oil just recently caught up to inflation.

Posted by: Bruce Allen at 06/12/2008 03:21:59 PM

I still think that the long term trend is up. As Mr. Moss noted, the easy oil is gone. Hubbert's Peak is not a theory, it's a reality.

Posted by: Jotson at 06/12/2008 05:41:57 PM

Tommy - thanks for an excellent comment. I echo your doubts precisely and am somewhat baffled that Kiplinger would publish something so over-simplified.

Posted by: Morrow at 06/13/2008 03:32:19 PM

Mr. Moss's statements are in direct conflict with lead article above which suggest oil at $100 by year end.

Posted by: R. Gulla at 06/14/2008 09:37:29 AM

As a consumer, I am tired (and very sick, too) of reading and listening to these anonymous "analysts" predict everything economics. Who are these people, anyway? For the last year, I've read and heard "analysts" say 'there's no reason oil prices should be this high (They started this claptrap at about $65 a barrel.) Yet, prices continued to soar. The oil sheiks were quoted just the other day (USA Today) saying 'there's no reason oil prices should be this high." Yet they continue to hover around $130 barrel. Some big mouth at one of the major investment banks predicts oil will go to $150 a barrel, and guess what happens? The price shoots up $6 bucks a barrel - becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. And who gets stiffed? The average consumer, while Congress, oil executives, and others sit on hands and do nothing. My fervent wish is that all those self-annointed, smug, know-it-all "analysts" will stuff their crystal balls and just shut up.

Posted by: D. Albert at 06/19/2008 07:54:57 AM

The big problem in the energy crisis is not big oil, big gas, big coal, etc. Rather, the big problem is big government. We have a tax-crazed government raking in hundreds of billions in taxes with no real investment, risk, or technical intelligence. Yet the arrogant spendthrifts continue to point fingers and throwing obstacles in the way so they can play the fear card, dupe their constituents into thinking that they are taking action rather than getting in the way...all for the purpose of getting reelected so they can continue on the government dole with all their plush benefits, including indexed benefits which hardly anyone outside of government receives. Congress is loaded with arrogant, ignorant, socialist, self-centered and counter productive fools. It's time to wake up and clean house in Congress.

Posted by: m at 06/19/2008 03:24:18 PM

D. Albert: Well said; As a Democrat I am extremely disgusted with Congress not pushing a stand alone bill thru that would open up drilling, building new nuclear plants and clean coal production. Everyone needs to email their Congressional rep and let them know in no uncertain terms that tomorrow isn't soon enough to stop the American people's financial pain!

Posted by: Terri LeGrand at 06/21/2008 06:57:20 PM

I read effective May 1, Iran was requiring payment for oil with euros. Haven't heard anything on the news. That could account for higher gasoline prices.

Today's Video More Videos >>

How to Save Money in November 2009

E-mail Alerts: Select the Kiplinger columns and topics to be delivered to your inbox:

Advertisement