The Cost of the Federal Budget Deficit
Tax hikes and higher interest rates plus inflation's bite top the list.
By Jerome Idaszak, Associate Editor, The Kiplinger Letter
March 30, 2009
- Comments
- Email This Article
- Print This Article
- Order a Reprint
Advertisement
The massive economic rescue plan carries with it an onerous price: a ballooning federal deficit that will equal 12.2% of the gross domestic product (GDP) this year, a post-World War II high.
President Barack Obama has in his budget for fiscal year 2010 a deficit of $1.3 trillion and promises to halve that by 2013. But success is a long shot, requiring a lot to go just right. For the next decade or so, annual deficits much below $700 billion will be tough to come by, and some are bound to top $1 trillion.
The result will be a huge amount of debt to be repaid. Uncle Sam already owes an amount equal to 41% of GDP. By 2019, that could double as expenses for Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid increase as the huge bulge of baby boomers continues to retire. Interest on outstanding debt will claim a larger share of the budget, from 4.2% this year to about 11% by 2013. "It will be the fastest growing category of the budget," says budget watcher Stan Collender, managing director for Qorvis Communications.
The inevitable consequence will be higher taxes -- or less money to spend on everything else, from food safety to road building, education, health care, energy, the environment and even homeland security and defense. Washington policymakers will face a series of tough choices. And the ambitious White House plans for reforms in health care, education and energy policy may be out of reach. Obama will be forced to cut back or delay his plans.
In any case, Uncle Sam will have to borrow much more to foot the tab. Long-term Treasury rates will climb to attract the investors needed. As U.S. households increase their savings in a new, more austere economic climate, their 5% share of Treasuries will increase. In the early 1990s, before the allure of stocks and real estate surged and bond yields fell, households held about 20% of outstanding Treasuries. But even if that level were regained, and that's unlikely in the short run, it wouldn't be enough to fund the $4.2-trillion increase in borrowing by the Treasury in the next few years.
To coax foreigners to continue lending the U.S. money, interest rates will move several percentage points higher. There won't be any escape from inflation, either. All the cash that the Federal Reserve is pumping into the ailing economy will create excesses as consumer spending recovers and the slack in the economy is absorbed, a shift likely to begin in early 2011.
Count on the central bank to raise short-term rates. But by the time the rate hikes start to constrain price increases, inflation will be running at around a 4% annual rate. It's a situation of Obama making a painful trade-off, opting to dose the patient in order to head off disaster now despite the certain misery from side effects later. But as Diane Swonk, chief economist with Mesirow Financial in Chicago, says: "The cost of doing nothing is greater than the cost of doing something. That's the crisis we're in."
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
- Comments
- RSS
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit any posted comments for clarity, appropriateness, civility, and relevance to the topic.
View our full privacy policy



Reader Comments (3)
Posted by: Joe Honick at 03/31/2009 12:16:13 PM
Given the profound impact of this deficit, why on earth is the DOD putting out Requests for Proposals for private PR firms to the tunes of tens of millions of dollars to help propagandize for the Iraqi military and government....when we should be billing the Iraqis and others for the services and sacrifices we performed there? More than that, why is Kiplinger not asking the same questions?
Posted by: old boy at 03/31/2009 10:58:44 PM
The old money Dad brought back from Germany after WWII; totally worthless he said, so much of it sloshing around that people had just thrown it out in the street as it took so much to buy anything. And the worst part of the story: "Upon entering buildings we would find people lying in bed in the middle of the day." Why? I had asked him. "Don't you understand", he said, "they had to have so much worthless money to buy food so there was no food to be bought and they were lying in bed trying to conserve what energy they could."
Posted by: Steve at 04/03/2009 05:49:56 PM
I'm sure there is no one who wants the deficit spending and we are all aware of its cost today and into the future. What I do not see is an estimate/article addressing the costs to our economy now and in the future if we do nothing. What is the cost of doing nothing?