Congress Will Push IRS to Get Tougher with Scofflaws
The IRS will become more of a heat-seeking missile in the way it targets who gets audited.
By Joan Pryde, Senior Tax Editor, the Kiplinger letters
June 4, 2007
Advertisement
The Internal Revenue Service will work harder to catch more deadbeats. Under pressure from lawmakers who need revenue, the agency is launching a new effort to reduce noncompliance among individual taxpayers. The tax gap -- the difference between what the IRS collects and what folks should be paying -- keeps rising and is now estimated at more than $300 billion a year. That's larger than this year's federal deficit.
To narrow the gap, the IRS will do more audits -- and do them smarter. To nab all scofflaws would take millions more exams, which Congress won't be willing to fund and taxpayers would never tolerate. So instead, the Service will target specific areas where noncompliance is high. That way it will get more bang for its audit buck.
Look for the IRS to follow a road map from congressional investigators who recently identified the best audit targets. The Government Accountability Office says the percentage of misreporting by taxpayers is unusually high among the following groups:
- Sole proprietors, who often underreport income and inflate write-offs.
- S corporations and partnerships, especially S company owners who take dividends instead of salaries to minimize payroll tax liability.
- Gamblers who may underreport their winnings or who subtract losses from winnings instead of reporting them as miscellaneous itemized deductions, as the law requires.
- Part-time farmers, who aren't supposed to use losses from farming to reduce their other income if they're just pursuing a hobby and not running a business.
- Taxpayers who itemize deductions on Schedule A. Errors occur most often with medical costs, charitable contributions and job-related expenses.
- Earned income tax credits taken by individuals who don't qualify.
- Investors who don't report capital gains properly. These include gains on sales of vacation homes, rental units, business property and farmland.
Another part of the IRS strategy is to do a few thousand random audits every year to find new areas to investigate. In the past, the IRS has fine-tuned the audit process by waiting several years before doing a big batch of line-by-line audits. Obtaining fresh compliance data each year instead of twice a decade or so will help the Service spot compliance problems faster. Bringing the audit formulas up to date will also hike revenue and reduce the likelihood of exams that result in no change.
Whom should the IRS go after first? Take our poll.
Congress will help by giving the IRS more tools to tackle noncompliance, particularly in the area of information reporting. By one estimate, about 50% of income not shown on a W-2 or a Form 1099 goes unreported. So lawmakers will require firms to file 1099s for payments of $600 or more to corporations. And to help the IRS track capital gains, Congress will make brokers report basis when securities are sold. Also look for lawmakers to increase penalties imposed on users of abusive tax shelters and to give the IRS more funds to upgrade the computers it uses to detect fraud.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.


Reader Comments (18)
Posted by: lu26000 at 06/03/2007 11:10:28 AM
Another way to fund Congress's pay raises and wasteful pet projects. using the IRS as a willing tool.
Posted by: Bruce Allen at 06/03/2007 04:07:47 PM
It's about time. Congress is, as usual, a day late and a dollar short. Though I have never had a problem with IRS, I feel that we the people have both a legal and an ethical obligation to pay our taxes in a timely manner. As a single person with no writeoffs, I feel that tax bite every payday, when I go shopping, when I fill up my gas tank, etc. In paying my taxes, I have purchased an option to air any grievance I might have about any reasonable issue, and this is also covered in the first amendment. Since so many people are currently complaining about this, that, or the other thing, I wonder if they are all paid up as far as ttaxes are concerned. Maybe Congress could do a study of that issue. On second thought, maybe we shouldn't. Special interest groups would get involved and screw up everything. Well, let's hope for the best.
Posted by: Corp Buster at 06/03/2007 04:18:26 PM
But, big multinational corporations don't pay their fair share. What about going after them, Capitol Hill?
Posted by: Rick at 06/04/2007 07:30:15 AM
A consumpsion tax will relieve this whole problem. Check out www.fairtax.org
Posted by: Roger at 06/04/2007 10:39:05 AM
3 words - National Sales Tax. It will put a lot of people out of work (IRS, Tax Companies, etc.), but it is a way to force 100% collection and is based on consumption - no loopholes.
Posted by: Cayden at 06/04/2007 12:27:18 PM
Corp Buster: Corporate taxes are a cruel joke, as they just get passed on to individuals in the form of higher prices. Bruce Allen: I agree that we all have a responsibility to pay the taxes that are levied upon us but I object to the unreasonably high taxes (I want less government not more) and the invasion of privacy that the IRS is. The tax code is hopelessly complex and, in my opinion, beyond repair. It's time to start fresh and the best proposal I've seen to date is a national fair tax. See: www.fairtax.org for more info. Compliance regulations is far simpler, the IRS pretty much goes away, the tax base we collect on is larger, and it's better for the economy... how can we lose!
Posted by: DEET at 06/04/2007 01:41:51 PM
If only us middle class people would pay more taxes, we could help out Exxon by increasing the 100 million dollar tax subsidy they recieved last year! I say all of our paychecks should go through D.C. FIRST, then they could just send us what they didn't want! It would make the system so much simplier! Or we could just vote Ron Paul in '08, and send the tax man to the unemployment line! You decide? Ron Paul in '08!
Posted by: Big Brother at 06/04/2007 03:07:50 PM
The IRS should target Congress first. The lack of integrity routinely exhibited by its members should make it a rich hunting ground for IRS review.
Posted by: wut at 06/04/2007 03:54:55 PM
Corp Buster... what r you talking about? corporations pay plenty already!
Posted by: Kevin at 06/04/2007 04:29:20 PM
If they instituted the Fair Tax (HR 25) then this would never be an issue. Government always looks to do things the hard way and never the smart way.
Posted by: Rkosha at 06/04/2007 07:46:05 PM
Institute Fair Tax (HR25), every body pays and we eliminate the cost of the IRS.
Posted by: Joan Pryde at 06/05/2007 10:46:47 AM
Hi, I'm Joan Pryde, the author of the article. I've been wondering, with folks understandably upset about the complexity of the tax code, why doesn't tax reform ever seem to get off the ground? There have been many proposals, especially recently, for either a flat tax or a national sales tax, but it's been more than 20 years since comprehensive tax overhaul has really been attempted. I'm not sure whether needing to fix the alternative minimum tax is enough of an incentive to get Congress off the dime.
Posted by: brek at 06/05/2007 01:02:30 PM
Why doesn't the tax system get reformed? Cause the system is totally corrupt. Congress is owned by special interest groups. I can assure you, there will be no meaningful reform until a crisis demands it. Everyone and his brother is on the federal gravy train, they all squeal when anyone tries to throw them off. Dodge all the tax you can and enjoy the good life while it lasts.
Posted by: mlp at 06/05/2007 05:17:34 PM
The government just wants to keep taking more money and giving it away, creating a generation of enabled bums.
Posted by: Jack at 06/07/2007 06:25:22 AM
Corporations, as inanimate objects, don't pay taxes. It's the people who buy the corporation's products that pay the taxes through the price of the goods sold. Raise their taxes and they, in turn, will raise the price of their product. It's simple stuff. Go after the "cash" (underground) people.
Posted by: rak at 06/07/2007 07:58:57 PM
Let all members of Congress be first in line to be subjected to a line by line annual Form 1040 review so that the public can be assured that all of their lecture income and "other" income is properly reported.
Posted by: Larry Gowell at 06/08/2007 12:16:29 PM
Taking a dividend from the corporation is minor because it only effects our social security taxes and not the federal and state. If we pay less fica taxes we also get less benefits when we retire. The big money is simply not recorded at all. For those dollars no local, federal, state or fica taxes are paid. Those are the dollars the government needs to go after. The underground world has got billions of dollars of cash rolling around the world.
Posted by: extaxgirl at 07/13/2007 06:21:53 PM
Rental incomes have increased immensely. We are relying on the honesty of owners to report the total actual rental income received. More audits should be made on rental properties income received, simply based on the number of units rented and income received per unit. For example, 10 units at $1,200.00 a month per unit is $12,000.00 per month. times 12 months is $ 144,000.00 per year. There is gross underreporting on this issue. There is no W-2 or 1099 to verify this huge amount of income today, only the word of the landlord. Lots of Luck!!!