Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > Business & Politics
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?

Too heavy. There’s no point having him die in jail.
About right.
Not nearly heavy enough.
Not sure
 
   view results
Compare Price Quotes 100+ Services
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 2, 2009
 

Overhauling
Financial Regs

By year-end or so, Congress will give the nod to a major rewriting of the nation's financial regulatory system. This week’s Kiplinger Letter explores whether the package will do more harm than good and what lawmakers are likely to include.
 
CORRECTIONS

TRY THE LETTER:

Subscribe
| See Sample
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I just attended a franchise seminar. The speaker represents a few hundred franchises that (he says) are hand picked. He has the prospect (aka victim?) answer some questions about themselves then he makes recomendations - based on your personality, capital situation, etc.. If you pick a franchise, then he does some due dilligence for you. If you both decide it's a good idea, he helps you get started. He says he offers this service free of charge, which means he gets a commission if he's able to sell you a franchise. Has anyone done this? Successfully? Unsuccessfully?
-- fender
 

Congress Set to Ban Workplace Bias Against Gays

But employers hope for clarifications before the new bill becomes law.
 
 

Expect the Democratic Congress to ban discrimination against gays by employers this year. There's broad support for a bill that makes it illegal to base decisions for hiring, firing or promotions on a person's sexual orientation or gender identity. A similar bill fell one vote short of passage in the Senate in 1996, and never gained any traction in the Republican-led House. Now that Democrats control both chambers of Congress, the proposal has its best chance ever for passage.

"This is common-sense legislation. Working men and women should be judged on the basis of their performance at work. They should not have to fear being fired because of their sexual orientation," says Rep. Christopher Shays (R-CT), a cosponsor of the legislation.

Employer groups are working to change some troubling language in the bill. The bill would not require employers to provide equal benefits to same-sex couples, but it does open the door for states and localities to require it. Employers say this would chip away at the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which bars states from mandating employment benefits for companies that self-insure.

Employers are also concerned that the bill's language on transgender persons is too broad, raising questions, for example, about bathroom and locker room access. "This vagueness could create a host of problems. What about those persons going through a sexual transition? At what point do they come under the protection of this bill?" says Michael Layman, manager of employment and labor policy at the Society of Human Resource Management.

Nineteen states already have enacted laws barring discrimination of gays and nearly 90% of Fortune 500 companies include sexual orientation in their corporate nondiscrimination policies.

President Bush is reserving judgment until he sees the final bill.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (3)


POSTED BY: Chuck (May 29, 2007 03:35 PM)
Over due protections that should not be necessary, but are.

POSTED BY: mike (May 31, 2007 03:38 PM)
Well what the heck. as long as there are no Public Display of Affection in the office, im fine with that.

POSTED BY: VIIEGREAT (June 01, 2007 08:32 AM)
George must be licking his lips, just itching to send the bill back.

SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   
ADD HEADLINES: