By year-end or so, Congress will give the nod to a major rewriting of the nation's financial regulatory system. This week’s Kiplinger Letter explores whether the package will do more harm than good and what lawmakers are likely to include.
ASK US:A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
OPEN FORUM:Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
I just attended a franchise seminar. The speaker represents a few hundred franchises that (he says) are hand picked. He has the prospect (aka victim?) answer some questions about themselves then he makes recomendations - based on your personality, capital situation, etc.. If you pick a franchise, then he does some due dilligence for you. If you both decide it's a good idea, he helps you get started.
He says he offers this service free of charge, which means he gets a commission if he's able to sell you a franchise.
Has anyone done this? Successfully? Unsuccessfully?
Small firms won't have to hire lawyers as often to translate federal regulations that govern what businesses can and can't do. A new law adds teeth to Clinton-era legislation requiring federal regulatory agencies to publish compliance guides for all new rules having a significant economic impact on small firms. Lawmakers acted because they believe too many agencies were ignoring their obligations to small businesses.
One aspect of the new law designed to help business owners say agencies must explain their rules "using sufficiently plain language likely to be understood by affected small entities." In plain English that means they must use plain English so firms won't have to decipher the gibberish, gobbledygook and bureaucratic legalese that many agencies routinely rely on.
"There always has been a need for compliance lawyers and there always will be," said Thomas Sullivan, chief counsel at the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy. "But, does this law does make it easier for small businesses to understand the rules? Yes."
Regulators will get called before Congress each year to defend their guides. It means, for example, that representatives from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration or the Internal Revenue Service will have to prove to lawmakers that they're producing these guides and writing them so businesses can understand them. The 1996 had no such enforcement provision.
In Congressional testimony, the SBA's Sullivan pointed to Federal Communications Commission Website with guidance for small firms that probably wouldn't pass muster under the new law. He said more than half of the 285 entries on the site don't even address compliance. "FCC's assertion that this Website somehow satisfies its Section 212 obligations comports neither with the letter nor the spirit of [the 1996 law]."
The new law makes clear that the guides must be available to the public at the time the new rules take effect. It also requires that each agency make their guides available on their Websites.
For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.
READER COMMENTS
Post a comment
Hide comment form
|
Read all comments (1)
Read recent comments
Permission to post your comment is assumed when you submit it. The name you provide will be used to identify your post, and NOT your e-mail address. We reserve the right to excerpt or edit for clarity any posted comments. View our full privacy policy
POSTED BY: madmilker (June 23, 2007 02:08 PM)
Plain English.....wow! It would be nice if English was the spoken word of the United States of America.