Business Resource Center
Subscribe

KIPLINGER FORECASTS

Home > Taxes, Regulation
 
 

EXECUTIVE POLL

Bernard Madoff, convicted of running an $65 billion Ponzi scheme, was sentenced to 150 years in jail. What’s your take on his punishment?

Too heavy. There’s no point having him die in jail.
About right.
Not nearly heavy enough.
Not sure
 
   view results
Compare Price Quotes 100+ Services
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 

OUR PREMIUM CONTENT


The Kiplinger Letter
 
 
 

CURRENT LETTER

 
The Kiplinger Washington Editors
July 2, 2009
 

Overhauling
Financial Regs

By year-end or so, Congress will give the nod to a major rewriting of the nation's financial regulatory system. This week’s Kiplinger Letter explores whether the package will do more harm than good and what lawmakers are likely to include.
 
CORRECTIONS

TRY THE LETTER:

Subscribe
| See Sample
 
YOUR FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIBERLOG: Got a topic you'd like to discuss? Or a problem or question? Please join our exclusive forum for Letter subscribers only.
 
ASK US: A Kiplinger Letter editor will promptly answer subscriber questions.
 
 
OPEN FORUM: Share your insights and analysis with other visitors.
 
I just attended a franchise seminar. The speaker represents a few hundred franchises that (he says) are hand picked. He has the prospect (aka victim?) answer some questions about themselves then he makes recomendations - based on your personality, capital situation, etc.. If you pick a franchise, then he does some due dilligence for you. If you both decide it's a good idea, he helps you get started. He says he offers this service free of charge, which means he gets a commission if he's able to sell you a franchise. Has anyone done this? Successfully? Unsuccessfully?
-- fender
 

Nonprofits' Tax Exemptions Increasingly Under Fire

Federal, state and local governments are taking an extra hard look at whether exempt organizations deserve their special tax status.
 
 

Tax breaks for nonprofit groups are facing heightened scrutiny from all levels of government because of concerns that some exempt organizations are primarily moneymaking operations that don't live up to the purposes for which they received their special tax status in the first place.

States and localities are combating the problem by denying property tax exemptions. This is a backdoor approach, since only the feds can yank a nonprofit's tax-exempt status. But it's a weapon that state and municipal governments are using more often when they believe exempt groups aren't toeing the line, especially when it comes to revenue producing outlets such as health clubs and day care centers, for example. Groups not charging customers based on their ability to pay are in the most danger. That is a prime indication that the facility isn't providing sufficient benefits to lower-income community residents.

This trend will continue, particularly as long as the economy stays in the doldrums: Many municipalities and state governments are experiencing significant funding shortfalls, and they are likely to see a clampdown on exempt organizations as a way to help make up those revenue losses.

So far, courts are backing up state and local governments in this area. For example, in Minnesota, the state supreme court recently ruled that Goodhue County's tax assessors acted properly in forcing a nonprofit day care center to pay property taxes. The court noted that families in Goodhue County who were receiving public assistance were charged the same tuition as families that didn't get help from the county. "To qualify for the exemption from property taxes as an institution of purely public charity, an organization must provide its 'charity' to recipients free of charge or at considerably reduced rates," the court said.

Congress is taking a look at this matter, too. Senate taxwriters, for example, are pressing tax-exempt public hospitals to provide more charity care. They are eyeing legislation, in fact, that would require all nonprofit hospitals to have written policies detailing indigent services, and to publicize them. As for universities, lawmakers want schools that have big endowments to use more of their earnings to reduce tuition. Exempt organizations will likely fall in line in order to avoid federal mandates.

For weekly updates on topics to improve your business decisionmaking, click here.

READER COMMENTS

Post a comment
 | 
Read all comments (5)


SAVE, SHARE & DISCUSS:    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   
ADD HEADLINES: