What You Should Know About Asset Allocation
No, 93.6% of your investment returns are not due to the asset allocation of your portfolio.
The purpose of this article is not to say that the concept of asset allocation is flawed or anything like that. The most important decisions in determining an investment portfolio are what asset classes to use and what percentages to put into each asset class. Diversifying your funds among different assets among different kinds of investments potentially reduces your overall risk because different investments should act differently at different times for different reasons. This is a very sound and accurate description of the investment world.
What I want to call your attention to when it comes to the idea of asset allocation is a commonly used—actually, misused—statistic. You have very likely seen somewhere in marketing materials out there that 93.6% of the investment returns you get are due to the asset allocation of your portfolio.
This is simply not true.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free E-Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.
Why am I writing about it now? Because in the last couple of months I've seen this misconception, or misunderstanding, a couple of times in some marketing materials that have come my way, and I wanted to share with you what Paul Harvey would call "the rest of the story."
The basis for this misunderstood issue comes from a 1986 article in the Financial Analysts Journal, titled "Determinants of Portfolio Performance," authored by Gary Brinson, L. Randolph Hood and Gilbert L. Beebower. The major tenant of the paper was that asset allocation mattered more than anything else—more important than even the specific stock or bond security selection or market timing.
The study looked at several specific pension funds over a specific time frame and reported on the variations in portfolio returns. It found the key driver of those returns was the choice of the asset classes used and the proportion that went into each asset class.
Here's where things get a bit confusing, and it stems from how the investment industry decided to use this information. Having been in the industry for more than 30 years, I've seen it time and time again. The marketing material will state that 93.6% of the return of your portfolio will come from the asset allocation of that portfolio. They have extrapolated the results of the Brinson, Hood, Beebower study and asserted that it applies to any and all portfolios over any time period. However, that 93.6% came only from the specific pension plans studied for that specific time frame, not any other portfolio over some other time frame.
As the risk of being really picky here, this is where the marketing departments of the financial services companies have gone too far. It's really simple to trot out the 93.6% number and make people think that the only key thing is asset allocation. Way too simple. And way too misleading. But it makes for great marketing material.
This comes full circle in an article published in March 2006 in Wealth Manager magazine, written by James Picerno, in which he interviewed Gary Brinson about his study results from twenty years before.
What did the author hope you would understand?
Summarizing the research, Mr. Brinson stated that deciding what asset classes to use and what percentages to use in those asset classes would have the biggest impact of the performance of the portfolios studied, and that those conclusions have stood the test of time.
Mr. Picerno then asked "Is there any particular misinterpretation or misuse that you find especially annoying?"
Mr. Brinson replied, "There's one quote that I see periodically. Let's say a portfolio had a return of, say, 10%, and someone will say, '93.6% of the return is due to asset allocation.' That's not true. That's not what the paper said; that's not the application of the paper. First of all, it didn't apply to an individual portfolio; it applied on average to the portfolios we were examining. The number is an average number, not a number that applies to every single portfolio."
Enough said?
So, please be aware of the misuse of the 93.6% statistic or any other percentage used in the same manner. If what you are reading or what is being presented to you is saying that the overwhelming percentage of investment returns is coming simply from asset allocation, know that the information is being misinterpreted or misused.
Take it from the author, Gary Brinson: this is not accurate. This is not a true statement. Be informed and be aware.
Charles C. Scott, Accredited Investment Fiduciary®, has more than 30 years of experience in the financial services industry. "Our mission is to help our clients discover, design and live the life that they want to live by matching their finances with their visions, values and goals."
Charles C. Scott, Accredited Investment Fiduciary®, has more than 30 years of experience in the financial services industry. He developed and managed an institutional sales department for Washington Mutual, and then served as the Northwest Regional Manager for MFS, America's oldest mutual fund company. Since 1993, he has been an independent adviser, focusing on providing his clients with objective, unbiased planning and investment advice. He has written for the Wall Street Journal, CFO Magazine and other publications.
-
Use An iPhone? You May Be Hearing From A Class-Action Lawsuit Group
A handful of suits against the iPhone maker seek to crack down on everything from app store purchases to messaging.
By Keerthi Vedantam Published
-
Capital One/Discover: What's In Their Wallet For You?
Push back on Capital One's planned merger with Discover is growing with one group of consumer advocates calling for a public hearing.
By Keerthi Vedantam Published
-
Should You Enroll in Medicare if You Still Have a Job?
This question is being asked more than ever these days, so here’s what you can do when it comes to making Medicare decisions while you’re still working.
By Jae W. Oh Published
-
Three Big Ways That Life Insurance Can Be a Lifeline
Life insurance not only provides a safety net for loved ones and leaves behind a lasting legacy, but the cash value can also help during financial hardship.
By Steve Sugumele Published
-
Romance Scams That Target Older Adults Rising: What to Do
Here are some tips to help you avoid falling for a scam, especially when a scammer tries to prey on your affection.
By Patrick M. Simasko, J.D. Published
-
Lessons Learned From Britney Spears’ Financial Conservatorship
The pop star’s recent memoir reveals the toll her involuntary conservatorship took on her and spotlights the drawbacks of these legal arrangements.
By Stacy Francis, CFP®, CDFA®, CES™ Published
-
Four Things to Know About Managing a Loved One’s Finances
Figuring out when it’s time and knowing how to talk about it are just the start. You also need info about estate plans, insurance and health care decisions.
By Tony Drake, CFP®, Investment Advisor Representative Published
-
Three Tax-Smart Strategies for Real Estate Investing
Opportunity zones, Delaware statutory trusts and real estate income funds can help investors maximize gains and mitigate taxes.
By Dwight Kay Published
-
Can Language Apps Teach You to Speak a Foreign Language?
Your expectations might be too high if you think an online language platform can teach you to have a meaningful conversation in a foreign language.
By H. Dennis Beaver, Esq. Published
-
Avoid Surprises: Don’t Procrastinate on Your Taxes
You really should start thinking about next year’s taxes immediately after filing this year’s. Better tax efficiency could save you some serious dough.
By Jared Elson, Investment Adviser Published